pág. 11994
METHODOLOGICAL STRATEGIES IN THE
DEVELOPMENT OF WRITING SKILLS
IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
ESTRATEGIAS METODOLÓGICAS EN EL DESARROLLO
DE LA HABILIDAD DE ESCRIBIR EN EL IDIOMA INGLÉS
Elida Maholy Moncayo Zambrano
Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí, Ecuador
Gema Lisseth Quiroz Zambrano
Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí, Ecuador
Celia María Lorena Saltos Dueñas
Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí, Ecuador
pág. 11995
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i1.10650
Methodological Strategies in the Development of Writing Skills in English
Language
Elida Maholy Moncayo Zambrano1
e1350652606@live.uleam.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2345-7665
Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí
Extensión Chone
Ecuador
Gema Lisseth Quiroz Zambrano
e1312257932@live.uleam.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9989-9005
Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí
Extensión Chone
Ecuador
Celia María Lorena Saltos Dueñas
celia.saltos@uleam.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8140-2364
Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí
Extensión Chone
Ecuador
ABSTRACT
The following investigation paper aims to analyze the different methodological strategies used to
develop writing practices in the English language in a class with 68 students in the sixth grade of primary
school in Chone City. For its elaboration, researchers made use of a descriptive focus, at the same time,
the sampling was chosen for convenience. Results were obtained from an interview with the unique
English teacher at the school and five observation files in the English classes of sixth grade. Finally,
results show the large students’ knowledge about grammar and orthography, but also the failure in the
texts' clarification and coherency. This paper is advantageous for the educational field, specifically, to
the factors that revolve around the writing learning–teaching process.
Keywords: methodological strategies, learning-teaching process, writing, english learning
1
Autor principal
Correspondencia: e13506526[email protected].ec
pág. 11996
Estrategias Metodológicas en el Desarrollo de la Habilidad de Escribir en el
Idioma Inglés
RESUMEN
El presente trabajo de investigación tiene como objetivo analizar las diversas estrategias metodológicas
utilizadas al momento de desarrollar las prácticas de escritura en el idioma inglés en una clase
conformada por 68 estudiantes del sexto año de educación básica de una Unidad Educativa Fiscal de la
ciudad de Chone. Para la elaboración de este se utilizó un enfoque descriptivo a la vez que se tomó un
muestreo por conveniencia. Para la obtención de los resultados se entrevistó al único docente de inglés
de la planta educativa, y cinco fichas de observación en las clases impartidas por la misma a los
estudiantes del sexto año. Los resultados reflejan que si bien los estudiantes tienen un vasto
conocimiento con respecto de las reglas gramaticales y ortográficas del idioma inglés existen falencias
en tanto la organización de las ideas afectando la claridad del texto. El estudio favorece a la
investigación y al área educativa, especialmente respecto a los factores a tomar en cuenta en el proceso
de enseñanza – aprendizaje de la escritura en una L2.
Palabras clave: estrategias metodológicas, proceso de enseñanza – aprendizaje, escritura, aprendizaje
del inglés
Artículo recibido 18 enero 2024
Aceptado para publicación: 20 febrero 2024
pág. 11997
INTRODUCTION
Function of the Methodological Strategies
When people talk about methodological strategies there are several opinions about the topic. According
to Arguello y Sequeira (2018), methodological strategies are discussed as the set of procedures that help
the teacher in the development of the learning–teaching process, allowing the students to improve skills
to create significant learning.
Gutiérrez et al., (2018) emphasize that methodological strategies are tools that not only contribute to
students’ learning, but also, to the interactions and the social relationship between teacher and students,
making learning environments that an innovative pedagogy that joins the learning and the classroom
elements in some cultural and physical particulars.
Finally, Quimi (2019) states that methodological strategies refer to the way, or the steps that take
advantage of the kids’ learning capacity, particularly in Reading and writing skills during the early
years of life.
The teacher must use methodological strategies and creative activities according to the learners' group
and consider individual differences.
Skills
Skills are described by authors as the set of habits, or as the capacity to successfully get the aim of each
activity (Milerian E. A.; 1958). And even are theorized as the capability of doing specific activities
which also depends on habits and the experience of the person.
García (2013) by side, defines skills as the expression of “know how to do it” that defines the action.
“There is the framework of each process that a student learns. Inside the linguistic field the skills to
develop are the comprehension, composition, and the text interpretation”.
When Gardner talked about the reading-writing process, he considered that the skill to develop is about
reading, writing, storytelling, and data recording, among others. (García, 2009)
Writing Teaching Strategies
Some authors consider that writing language acquisition is only possible through a series of long and
tedious processes, the same process involves children having access to this kind of language like a
compilation of several text genres, as a result, the infant Will be able to identify poetry from a new or a
pág. 11998
novel with a single see, even if the kid is not able to elaborate it. (Tolchinsky, 1993; Camps, 1994;
Schneuwly, 1995). At the same time, Caldera (2003) sustains that writing teaching is formed by three
important factors: 1) writing as a product; 2) writing as a process; and 3) writing according to the
context. The first factor refers to the traditional method, focusing on the product composition analyzing
the superficial characteristics of the text, such as the grammar, the orthography, and the vocabulary; and
ignoring the deep sense of the paper.
Malo Toledo (2020) suggested the use of diaries as a tool to encourage the growth of writing skills in
students, demonstrating a positive effect on the capability of the learners to generate texts.
Otárola Heredia (2020) used technology implementation and the writing obtaining as a result not only
progress but also, a better response from students to English class.
However, Almeida, Vilas-Boas-Barreto, and Alves-Argollo (2020) consider graphomotricity one of the
most important stages of improving prewriting, this allowed the global development of efficient writing
harmonizing children’s educative process.
Gutiérrez-Silva (2018) reinforces this theory by mentioning that graphomotricity is closely related to
psychomotricity, being the second one responsible for human coordination development, this permits
to identify of some strategies used nowadays by teachers and analyze of how psychomotricity affects
the graphomotricity.
Methodological Strategies Propose for Writing Teaching
Students show several problems when they try to learn English language writing, among these reasons
readers can find the low level of technique application striking down the learners’ motivation; the lack
of preparation of the professor before a class also produces bad learning and an estrangement between
teacher and pupils.
According to Varela and Villamil (2010), the most favorable strategies to improve writing in students
can divided into three fundamental parts such as pre-writing, writing, and post-writing.
In the first part, the sentence maker is indispensable being the easiest part, followed by the knowledge
of grammar and orthographic rules permitting the student to discover his writing style about the different
topics. It is inevitable as “What is written?”, “Who is going to read it?”, “How is written?”.
pág. 11999
The second step is gathered in practice, despite, it is necessary that the person got the previous
knowledge. Sadly, in the educative system exists failure in writing production, these mistakes are not
grammatical, linguistical, or even glossary (Arias, et al., 2012) English teaching has no importance that
the researchers would like it, consequently, learners handle with writing process without pass by the
pre-writing process. If students get the correct preparation, they will be able to create detailed
descriptions and well-structured paragraphs.
Finally, in the post-writing pupils can write essays, summaries, narrations, and reports.
Writing Definition and its Elements
In so far as Numan (1991) “writing is a skill hard to acquire, especially in a second language” being
this thought besides Palmer Silveira (2002) “that feeling of difficulty commonly turns into a nuisance
for students’ at the moment to generate a text”.
What’s more, when teachers teach English writing as a second language this could be affected by
students’ age, which means, “if the child does not know how to create text in a formal context in his L1
hardly he will do it in an L2” (Tribble, 1996).
The use of phonology at the instant to teach the reading-writing process, not only gets out of the
traditional model, but also, allows children to develop openly other skills such as listening, thinking
about the sounds, and avoiding the lack of letters in writing time. (Calderon, Carrillo & Rodríguez,
2006). Nevertheless, another defiance that revolves around English writing as a second language is the
inexistent phonetic relationship in the language, which conversely exists in languages such as Spanish
and Italian (O’Shanahan, et al., 2010).
At this point, a technique called “free writing” appears to become a guide to students. In this technique,
learners can write their thoughts and ideas without worrying about grammar, orthography, and other
language parameters. Pupils don't need to think that this exercise going to be evaluated through grades,
just is necessary to give them 10 minutes before the class and ask them to write about a topic of their
interest. In addition to this Elbow expresses that “the best learning manner – in the practice, not in the
theory – is separate the process from the production from the evaluation.”
pág. 12000
METHODOLOGY
This research used a descriptive method with qualitative and quantitative methods, data were collected
through observation files which were applied to 68 students from the sixth grade in a primary school.
In addition, an interview was applied too to the unique English professor in the educative center. The
collection time was about 5 weeks during the academic period. It was necessary to request permission
from the respective authorities in the school and schedule an extracurricular meeting with the signature
teacher. The instruments were valid by five experts in the educative field, specifically in English
teaching.
Researching context: The study was conducted in Chone City, Manabí, Ecuador, with 68 students and
1 foreign language teacher. This context was selected because researchers realized in their first approach
to the institution, during their teaching practices, a lack in the English writing teaching process. The
sample was chosen by convenience, which means, participants were selected because they are more
accessible for the researcher.
RESULTS
Interview Results
After the interview, these responses were obtained.
Question 1: The skills to improve in the writing process are reading comprehension and vocabulary
revision, this response is supported by García (2013) previously explained.
Question 2: The strategies used by the professor in order to develop those skills are bingo, order words,
etc. To sum up, the teacher used gamification, allowing the strength of the abilities and skills acquired
in the learning-teaching process (Tenorio et al., 2022).
Question 3: In one line text, the teacher guides students giving clear instructions and monitoring each
step. However, because of the large number of students and the low-class time the teacher cannot make
a correct control to everyone.
Question 4: Depending on the activity, the teacher incentivizes students. Consider that Lisa and
Wormington, (2019) express that the principal goal in education is to promote students’ motivation.
Question 5: The teacher sustains relevant know the age and the writing level of the students. This is
necessary in the pre-writing process.
pág. 12001
Observation results
Table 1
Introduction
Always
%
Usually
%
Sometimes
%
Total
%
The class’ aims must be clear and achievable
for students.
100
0
0
100
Students must comprehend the class aims to
participate in the activities.
0
100
0
100
The methodological strategy must be adequate
for the improvement level of students.
60
40
0
100
Methodological strategy must encourage
students’ participation and motivate them at the
writing time.
60
40
0
100
Fuente: Unidad Educativa Fiscal de Chone
Elaborado por: Elida Maholy Moncayo Zambrano & Gema Lisseth Quiroz Zambrano.
In the first table is possible to see that the teacher always stabilized clear and achievable objectives for
students. Aims are defined by Salcedo (2011) as “expressions that show the intention or the purpose in
the teacher’s mind.”
The children's participation was noticed in 100% of the classes when the aims were assimilated and
understood correctly.
In 60% of the classes, the strategy used by the teacher was accurate to learners’ study level, promoting
participation and encouraging them to write.
Table 2
Develop
Always
%
Usually
%
Sometimes
%
Never
%
Total
%
Students show an accurate orthographic
domain and basic grammar in the English
language.
0
100
0
0
100
Students structure their writing in a coherent
and organized way.
0
0
100
0
100
The teacher gives support to students during
the writing practice.
60
40
0
0
100
Students practice sentence and paragraph
construction independently.
40
40
20
0
100
The teacher foments the revision and the
correction of linguistics and orthographic
mistakes.
0
80
20
0
100
The teacher recognizes and celebrates the
students’ individual and collective
achievements in their English papers.
40
60
0
0
100
Fuente: Unidad Educativa Fiscal de Chone
Elaborado por: Elida Maholy Moncayo Zambrano & Gema Lisseth Quiroz Zambrano.
pág. 12002
The second table keeps the constancy that students usually show knowledge about the orthographic and
grammar rules. Showing that even if exist lack in their creations these are expected by the teacher.
Despite this, in referential classes, students do not show the correlation between their ideas, therefore,
they hand over a deficient product.
In 60% of the classes, the teacher can give accurate feedback to their students, but in 40% of the cases
it is impossible to do it, that is because of the time limitations and the number of pupils in the classroom.
Related to the independent paragraph elaboration, students can work alone most of the time,
nevertheless, on some occasions they need the teacher to push more than usual in the elaboration of the
assignments.
The 80% of the class the teacher can make corrections to each student according to their mistakes in
their texts, improving the production of those students who receive the feedback, but affecting those
who do not do it, that is because of the factors mentioned before.
When it is about the recognition and the celebration of students' achievements, the teacher usually
celebrates with them, especially when these ameliorate are very significant.
Table 3
Conclusions
Always
%
Usually
%
Sometimes
%
Never
%
Total
%
The teacher offers specific and constructive
feedback about students’ papers.
60
40
0
0
100
The teacher adjusts the feedback according
to the writing skill evolution of each student.
20
80
0
0
100
The teacher ends the lesson with activities
that show the achievement of the initial aim.
100
0
0
0
100
Fuente: Unidad Educativa Fiscal de Chone
Elaborado por: Elida Maholy Moncayo Zambrano & Gema Lisseth Quiroz Zambrano.
The 60% of classes, show the teacher giving constructive and specific feedback about the papers handed
over to the students, correcting key mistakes that were repeated in several worksheets.
The 80% of classes, the teacher used to adjust the feedback to previous lessons but forgot about some
others. In 20% of classes, the teacher can remember the previous feedback and join it with the new.
Finally, each lesson ends in a totality with an activity that helps to evaluate the aim of the lesson.
pág. 12003
DISCUSSION
Concerning the applied instruments researchers can highlight that specific aims set out clearly and
concisely in the first stage of the class contribute favorably to the knowledge and the practice developed,
being an important part of the learning-teaching process of the English language as Hernando (2011)
considers that the aim expresses the need for the student to acquire certain knowledge, skills, attitudes,
and/or abilities.
Also, the frequent feedback by the teacher helps in the constant improvement of text production and
likewise contributes to the pupils’ vocabulary, expanding the L2 glossary. The Update Center in Higher
Education (CAES, for its acronym in Spanish) considers that feedback promotes dialogue between the
teacher and students. Moments of dialogue with students – in which information is provided about the
work done – allow them to ask questions and, in this way, improve performance.
As work methodology, researchers suggest an approach change in teaching, borrowing more attention
to the ideas coordination to get clarity in texts for the readers, avoiding confusion, and extolling paper
quality.
Similarly, the authors suggest the diverse methodologies implementation that gets out to the traditional
approach and allows learners to get excited about the assignments, keeping the expectation of finding a
new challenge and reducing the monotony of boring lessons. Promoting in them an interest in research,
exploration, the search for solutions to real problems, overcoming different challenges, and creating
meaningful experiences, which in turn invites them to reflect and criticize. (Yuridia, 2023)
Therefore, students become the protagonists in the classroom, having a proactive role and in which
interactive processes are carried out through active communication, where teachers guide them and
attend to their academic needs.
Analyzing the goodwill of the apprentices to develop text independently was possible to realize the high
orthographic level, but on some occasions is indispensable that the teacher push more than usual to
obtain results and reduce students' exploration of the vocabulary by themselves, as well as the grammar
rules.
pág. 12004
CONCLUSIONS
The methodological strategies are those that draw the line of the class, becoming the most important
factor now of elaborating the work plan, these strategies are the direct responsible of the motivation in
a class, causing their success or failure.
One of the modern challenges in English writing teaching is the absence of dynamism in class, therefore
students feel reluctant about work in this skill, even considering it low necessary in an L1, and
reinforcing this thought line to an L2, where commonly prefer to develop listening and speaking skills
because consider that in these skills, grammar rules are less, making its memorization easier.
Talking about writing production in an L2, refers to a productive skill of the language, meaning, makes
part of the two necessary skills to transmit our feelings, thoughts, and ideas to a select group or a public,
thus constant practice is required in these parameters to broadcast perfectly that the writer wants to
project (Golkova and Hubackova, 2014).
Finally, emphasizes the problem of the class schedules and the number of students, making hard the
performance, the specific feedback in search of personalized improvement in the creation of the content
written by students.
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
(Argüello”,n.d.)
Argüello”, R. “cornelio S. (n.d.). UNAN-FAREM CHONTALES. Edu. Ni. Retrieved January 24, 2024,
from https://repositorio.unan.edu.ni/1638/1/10564.pdf
(Caldera, n.d.)Caldera, R. (n.d.). Redalyc.org. Retrieved January 26, 2024, from
https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/356/35662002.pdf
(De Investigación et al., n.d.)De Investigación, T., Sánchez, Q., Margot, Y., Oswaldo, A., Gil, P.,
Guayaquil, M., Mosquera, S. G., Rizzo Bajaña, P., Sánchez, A. A., & Sebastián, C.
(n.d.). Universidad De Guayaquil Facultad De Filosofía, Letras Y Ciencias De La Educación
Carrera: Educaciòn Primaria -Modalidad SemipresenciaL. Edu. Ec. Retrieved January 24,
2024, from https://repositorio.ug.edu.ec/server/api/core/bitstreams/951f76d5-2b98-42e9-98bc-
9251a8a5f395/content
pág. 12005
(Delgado & Quiroz, 2021)Delgado, J., & Quiroz, D. (2021). Estrategias metodológicas una práctica
docente para el alcance de la lectoescritura. Polo Del Conocimiento, 6, 17451765.
(Enríquez, 2019)Enríquez, M. del C. (2019). Propuesta de estrategias metodológicas para aplicar el
Proyecto Fonológico y facilitar el Proceso de Lecto-Escritura en Niños de Segundo Año de
Educación General Básica en la Institución Educativa “Manuel Adrián Navarro.” PUCE-
Quito.
(Golkova & Hubackova, 2014)Golkova, D., & Hubackova, S. (2014). Productive skills in second
language learning. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 477481.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.520
(Hernando, 2011) Hernando, S. G. (2011). Los objetivos y su importancia para el proceso de enseñanza-
aprendizaje. Revista de Pedagogía. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/659/65926549007.pdf
(La importancia de la retroalimentación, n.d.)La importancia de la retroalimentación. (n.d.). Edu.uy.
Retrieved February 20, 2024, from
https://caes.ort.edu.uy/herramientas-para-la-docencia/la-importancia-de-la-retroalimentacion
(N.d.-b). Tdx.Cat. Retrieved January 31, 2024, from
https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/10435/cap4.pdf;sequence=7.
(O’Shanahan et al., 2010) O’Shanahan, I., Siegel, L. S., Jiménez, J. E., & Mazabel, S. (2010).
Analizando procesos cognitivos y de escritura en niños hispanoparlantes que aprenden inglés
como segunda lengua y niños canadienses de habla inglesa. European Journal of Education
and Psychology, 3(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.30552/ejep.v3i1.37
(Revista de Pedagogía, n.d.)Revista de Pedagogía. (n.d.). Redalyc.org. Retrieved February 6, 2024,
from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/659/65926549007.pdf
(Tenorio et al., 2022)Tenorio, S., Tenorio, W., & Carrera, R. (2022). Gamificación en el proceso de
lectoescritura. Revista Académica y Científica VICTEC, 3(4).
http://portal.amelica.org/ameli/journal/572/5724441005/
(Vintimilla-Ormaza et al., 2020)Vintimilla-Ormaza, M.-L.-Á., García-Herrera, D. G., Álvarez-Lozano,
M. I., & Erazo-Álvarez, J. C. (2020). Estrategias Pedagógicas para el desarrollo de la
pág. 12006
grafomotricidad. Revista Arbitrada Interdisciplinaria Koinonía, 5(1), 508.
https://doi.org/10.35381/r.k.v5i1.795
(Vista de Estrategias metodológicas interactivas para la enseñanza y aprendizaje en la educación
superior, n.d.)Vista de Estrategias metodológicas interactivas para la enseñanza y aprendizaje
en la educación superior. (n.d.). Edu. ec. Retrieved January 22, 2024, from
https://revista.uisrael.edu.ec/index.php/rcui/article/view/282/166
(Vista de Importancia de estimular las inteligencias múltiples en educación inicial. Habilidades y
destrezas, n.d.)Vista de Importancia de estimular las inteligencias múltiples en educación
inicial. Habilidades y destrezas. (n.d.). Redipe.org. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from
https://revista.redipe.org/index.php/1/article/view/1096/992
(Vista de La Enseñanza de la lectura y escritura en el programa AILEM-UC, n.d.)
Vista de La Enseñanza de la lectura y escritura en el programa AILEM-UC. (n.d.).
Revistanortegrande.uc.cl. Retrieved January 26, 2024, from
https://revistanortegrande.uc.cl/index.php/pel/article/view/23847/19199
(Yuridia, 2023)Yuridia. (2023, February 24). Aplicación de metodologías activas. Innova Schools
México. https://innovaschools.edu.mx/blog/como-aplicar-las-metodologias-activas-en-el-aula-
escolar/
Almeida, V., Vilas-Boas-Barreto, B., & Alves-Argollo, R. (2020). Comunicación y Educación: La
potencia dialógica del audiovisual. [Communication and Education: The dialogical power of
audiovisuals]. EPISTEME KOINONIA, 3(5), 122-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.35381/e.k.v3i5.682
Calderón G., G., Carrillo P., M., & Rodríguez M., M. (2006). La conciencia fonológica y el nivel de
escritura silábico: un estudio con niños preescolares. Límite. Revista Interdisciplinaria de
Filosofía y Psicología, 1(13), 81-100.
Elbow P. Writing with Power. Techniques for Mastering the Writing Process. Oxford: Oxford
University Press; 1981.
García, M. T. (2009). La dimensión comunicativa de las inteligencias múltiple. CIC. Cuadernos
de Información y Comunicación. Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe,
España y Portugal. Vol. 14, pág. 145
pág. 12007
Gardner, H. (2016). Estructuras de la mente. La teoría de las inteligencias múltiples. Nueva york:
fondo de cultura económica, pág.4
Gutiérrez, J., Jacob, F., & Gutiérrez, C. (2018). Estrategias didácticas de enseñanza y aprendizaje desde
una perspectiva interactiva. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689
1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Gutiérrez-Silva, M. P. (2018). Estrategias metodológicas de psicomotricidad para desarrollar la
grafomotricidad en los niños de 5 años de edad [Methodological psychomotricity strategies to
develop graphomotricity in 5-year-old children]. Universidad Nacional Pedro Luiz. Obtenido
de https://n9.cl/s6stf
INCA CHUNATA, Nanci Margarita; CELLERI QUINDE, Silvana Patricia; GUANO MERINO,
Daniela Fernanda y VELASTEGUI LOPEZ, Efraín. Modelo ICARE para el desarrollo de la
habilidad de escritura en la enseñanza del Inglés. Universidad y Sociedad [online]. 2022,
vol.14, n.1 [citado 2024-01-31], pp.356-364. Disponible en:
http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2218-
36202022000100356&lng=es&nrm=iso . Epub 10-Feb-2022. ISSN 2218-3620 .
Lisa, L.-G., & Wormington, a. S. (2019). An integrative perspective for studying motivation concerning
engagement and learning. The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning, pp. 739758.
Malo Toledo, C. F. (2020). El diario como instrumento para potenciar la habilidad de escritura del
idioma inglés en universitarios. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 3(3), 149-157.
Otárola Heredia, J. L., Díaz Larenas, C. H., & Cuitiño Ojeda, J. C. (2020). Historias digitales mediante
Windows Movie Maker, Una herramienta para mejorar la escritura en inglés. Entramado,16(1),
122-136.
Saborit Leiva, Hildo, Texidor Pellón, Raiza, & Portuondo Ferrer, Nereida. (2014). Sugerencias para
desarrollar la escritura en las clases de inglés. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, 13(4),
605-611. Recuperado en 03 de febrero de 2024, de
http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729-
519X2014000400012&lng=es&tlng=es.
pág. 12008
Sixto, S. & Márquez, J. L. (2017). Tendencias teóricas en la conceptualización de las habilidades:
Aplicación en la didáctica de la Oftalmología. Rev. Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río. Vol. 21,
N.º 3, pág. 44
Varela Acosta, G. E., & Villamil Acosta, G. D. C. (2013). Estrategias metodológicas en la enseñanza
de la escritura en inglés en las estudiantes de octavo año de educación básica del colegio
particular Obiedo [Tesis de pregrado, Universidad Técnica del Norte]. Recuperado de
http://repositorio.utn.edu.ec/handle/123456789/2192