EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION IN MEXICO:
ENHANCING LEARNING WITH ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE, APPLYING CHATGPT IN
HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS,
PROFESSOR-STUDENT COLLABORATION
INNOVACIÓN EDUCATIVA EN MÉXICO: MEJORA DEL
APRENDIZAJE CON INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL, APLICACIÓN
DE CHATGPT EN INSTITUCIONES DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR,
COLABORACIÓN PROFESOR-ESTUDIANTE
Pedro Jácome Onofre
Department of Industrial Engineering of the National Technology of Mexico
Jesús Manuel Orona Hinojos
Managing Director of Company Data Sc Consultancy Group México
Guillermo Reyes Morales
Department of Mechatronic Engineering of the National Technology of Mexico,
Campus San Andrés México
Eduardo Macias Ávila
Manager Company Data Sc Consultancy Group. Duvhe México
Alfonso Flores Leal
Department of Computer Systems Engineering of the National Technology of Mexico
Campus Orizaba - México
Benjamin Alvarez Jimenez
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering of the National Technology of
Mexico
pág. 6210
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i3.11819
Educational Innovation in Mexico: Enhancing Learning with Artificial
Intelligence, Applying ChatGPT in Higher Education Institutions,
Professor-Student Collaboration
Pedro Jácome Onofre1
pedrojacome@itssat.edu.mx
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-8893
Department of Industrial Engineering of the
National Technology of Mexico
Campus SanAndrés Tuxtla
Veracruz, México
Jesús Manuel Orona Hinojos
jesus.orona@datasc-consultant.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6416-1514
Managing Director of Company Data Sc
Consultancy Group
Coahuila, México
Guillermo Reyes Morales
guillermoreyes@itssat.edu.mx
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7341-3784
Department of Mechatronic Engineering of the
National Technology of Mexico, Campus San
Andrés Tuxtla
Veracruz,México.
Eduardo Macias Ávila
eduardo.macias@datasc-consultant.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6438-1119
Manager Company Data Sc Consultancy Group.
Duvhe
Coahuila, México.
Alfonso Flores Leal
alfonso.fl@orizaba.tecnm.mx
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6207-6307
Department of Computer Systems Engineering
of the National Technology of Mexico
Campus Orizaba
Veracruz México
Benjamin Alvarez Jimenez
benjamin.aj@orizaba.tecnm.mx
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6995-1270
Department of Electrical and Electronic
Engineering of the National Technology of
Mexico
Campus Orizaba Veracruz, México
ABSTRACT
This study explores the integration of artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, into higher education
institutions in Mexico as a means of fostering educational innovation. The focus is on leveraging
ChatGPT to enhance professor-student collaboration and improve the overall learning experience. The
research delves into the implementation of ChatGPT in diverse academic settings to analyze its impact
on student engagement, knowledge retention, and collaborative learning dynamics. The study employs
a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data collection through pre- and post-
implementation assessments, and qualitative insights gathered from interviews, surveys, and focus
groups with both professors and students. By examining the perceptions and experiences of participants,
the research aims to identify the strengths and challenges associated with integrating ChatGPT into the
higher education program of studies in Mexico. The findings shed light on the effectiveness of ChatGPT
in facilitating interactive and dynamic exchanges between professors and students. Additionally, the
study investigates the role of ChatGPT in personalized learning experiences, addressing individual
student needs and learning preferences. Ultimately, this study contributes to the discourse on educational
innovation in Mexico by offering insights into the transformative potential of artificial intelligence,
particularly ChatGPT, in higher education. Ultimately, this study contributes to the discourse on
educational innovation in Mexico by offering insights into the transformative potential of artificial
intelligence, particularly ChatGPT, in higher education. The outcomes of this research provide practical
recommendations for institutions seeking to integrate AI technologies to active professor-student
collaboration and improve the overall educational view.
Keywords: personalized learning, collaborative learning dynamics, homeschooling, innovation in
mexico
1
Autor Principal
Correspondencia: pedrojacome@itssat.edu.mx
pág. 6211
Innovación educativa en México: mejora del aprendizaje con inteligencia
artificial, aplicación de ChatGPT en instituciones de educación superior,
colaboración profesor-estudiante
RESUMEN
Este estudio explora la integración de la inteligencia artificial, específicamente ChatGPT, en
instituciones de educación superior en México como medio para fomentar la innovación educativa. El
enfoque está en aprovechar ChatGPT para mejorar la colaboración entre profesores y estudiantes y
mejorar la experiencia de aprendizaje en general. La investigación profundiza en la implementación de
ChatGPT en diversos entornos académicos para analizar su impacto en el compromiso estudiantil, la
retención de conocimientos y la dinámica del aprendizaje colaborativo. El estudio emplea un enfoque
de métodos mixtos, combinando la recopilación de datos cuantitativos mediante evaluaciones previas y
posteriores a la implementación, y percepciones cualitativas obtenidas de entrevistas, encuestas y grupos
focales con profesores y estudiantes. Al examinar las percepciones y experiencias de los participantes,
la investigación tiene como objetivo identificar las fortalezas y desafíos asociados con la integración de
ChatGPT en el programa de estudios de educación superior en México. Los hallazgos arrojan luz sobre
la efectividad de ChatGPT para facilitar intercambios interactivos y dinámicos entre profesores y
estudiantes. Además, el estudio investiga el papel de ChatGPT en experiencias de aprendizaje
personalizadas, abordando las necesidades individuales de los estudiantes y sus preferencias de
aprendizaje. En última instancia, este estudio contribuye al discurso sobre la innovación educativa en
México al ofrecer perspectivas sobre el potencial transformador de la inteligencia artificial, en particular
ChatGPT, en la educación superior. Los resultados de esta investigación proporcionan recomendaciones
prácticas para instituciones que buscan integrar tecnologías de IA para activar la colaboración profesor-
estudiante y mejorar la visión educativa en general.
Palabras clave: aprendizaje personalizado, dinámicas de aprendizaje colaborativo, educación en el
hogar, innovación en México
Artículo recibido 20 mayo 2024
Aceptado para publicación: 24 junio 2024
pág. 6212
INTRODUCTION
Educational systems worldwide are undergoing a transformative shift with the integration of artificial
intelligence (AI) technologies. In Mexico, as in many other countries, the pursuit of educational
innovation has become a focal point to enhance learning outcomes and prepare students for the
challenges of the 21st century (Chiu, 2024). This study delves into the realm of AI, specifically the
application of ChatGPT, in higher education institutions across Mexico, with a primary focus on
fostering collaboration between professors and students. The motivation for this research stems from
the recognition that traditional teaching methods are encountering challenges in meeting the diverse
needs of modern learners. As students increasingly engage with digital technologies in their daily lives,
the integration of AI into educational settings becomes not only relevant but imperative. Furthermore,
the research is prompted by a genuine curiosity about how AI, and specifically ChatGPT, can transcend
conventional boundaries to create a collaborative learning environment. The desire is to understand how
this technology can act as a catalyst for increased student engagement, improved knowledge retention,
and the establishment of a more interactive and personalized educational experience (Hallal et al., 2023).
Traditional teaching methods often struggle to engage students who are accustomed to digital
interactions in their daily lives. The existing educational paradigm may not fully capitalize on the
opportunities presented by AI to create a more dynamic and personalized learning environment (Vera,
2023). This research aims to address this problem by investigating the efficacy of ChatGPT in enhancing
professor-student collaboration and its impact on student engagement and knowledge retention.
Furthermore, the problem statement encompasses the need to develop a nuanced understanding of the
ethical considerations associated with the integration of AI in education (Vera, 2023). As AI
technologies become more prevalent in higher education settings, there is a lack of comprehensive
guidelines and best practices tailored to the Mexican context. This research seeks to identify and address
these ethical considerations to ensure the responsible deployment of ChatGPT within academic
institutions. The problem statement also acknowledges the potential challenges and barriers that may
arise during the implementation of ChatGPT in higher education. These challenges could range from
technical issues to resistance from educators or concerns related to data privacy. Understanding and
mitigating these challenges are crucial for the successful adoption of AI technologies in the Mexican
pág. 6213
higher education landscape. Through this research, we aspire to contribute valuable insights that can
inform educational policymakers, institutions, and educators in Mexico, providing practical
recommendations for harnessing the potential of AI to enrich professor-student collaboration and elevate
the quality of education in the country. As we navigate the intersection of technology and education, it
is essential to strike a delicate balance that maximizes the benefits of AI while upholding the ethical
standards that underpin effective and responsible educational practices.
Objectives
The objective is to understand how the integration of this artificial intelligence technology can positively
impact student engagement, knowledge retention, and the overall quality of collaboration between
teachers and students. And identify the strengths and challenges associated with ChatGPT integration.
Literature Review
The literature review on educational innovation in Mexico, particularly focusing on enhancing learning
with artificial intelligence (AI) and applying ChatGPT in higher education institutions, with an emphasis
on professor-student collaboration, can explore various dimensions of this dynamic field. Below is an
outline that covers key aspects and potential themes for a comprehensive literature review:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative technology in the scientific community with
the potential to accelerate and improve research in various fields. ChatGPT, a popular language model
is one of those AI-based systems that is increasingly being discussed and adapted in scientific research.
However, as with any technology, there are challenges and limitations that need to be addressed. This
article focuses on the empowerment that ChatGPT faces in the field of higher education research. This
author mentioned This article will take organic materials as examples in the use of ChatGPT. Overall,
this article aims to provide information on the challenges and limitations of researchers working at
higher level (Cheng, 2023). Many researchers have quickly realized and discussed the future impacts of
ChatGPT on scientific writing and publishing. However, how this open access AI tool can be used to
facilitate technical research has not yet been explored as is the rationale. Problem posing in higher level
work so that an academic work does not lack ideas, and above all interprets communication. This article
will use ChatGPT as a model to demonstrate how this technique can help in scientific research (Cheng,
2023). Higher education is crucial to producing ethical citizens and professionals globally. The
pág. 6214
introduction of generative AI (GenAI), such as ChatGPT, has brought opportunities and challenges to
the traditional education model. However, current conversations focus on policy development and
evaluation, with limited research on the future of higher education. GenAI's impact on learning
outcomes, pedagogy and assessment is crucial to reforming and advancing the academic workforce.
This qualitative study aims to investigate students' perspectives on the impact of GenAI in higher
education (Chiu, 2024).
How do ChatGPT and other forms of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) affect the way we have
been conducting and evaluating academic research, teaching, and business practice? (Peres et al., 2023).
Well, it doesn't affect us, the reality is that we focus our thoughts on other activities that ChatGPT cannot
intervene in, for example, in practical activities, such as maintaining an engine, turning on and turning
a part, or starting up some industrial equipment. I argue that ChatGPT and other generative artificial
intelligence tools pose three main threats to our current education systems, creating problems of
measurement, information accuracy, and skill devaluation. But when we place these threats into
historical context, we see that AI tools can also empower students and level the educational playing
field. In classrooms from primary to tertiary and spanning all content areas, we can help our students
become critical thinkers by using ChatGPT to comprehend texts, aggregate knowledge, and understand
genre conventions in prose as well as programming. The aim is to help students leverage AI as a tool
that they question and critique, advancing their own comprehension, research, and composition skills in
the process (Steele, 2023).
Innovating in teaching with ChatGPT
This is about making ChatGPT a trusted advisor for teachers and students at the higher level in this
revolutionary ChatGPT technology that provides practical strategies to plan and execute more inclusive
and effective classes. The research begins with the search for the research articles to be included in the
study (Einarsson et al., 2024). This paper explores the potential of large language models, specifically
ChatGPT, to reframe problems from probability theory and statistics, making them accessible to students
across diverse academic fields including biology, economics, law, and engineering (Einarsson et al.,
2024). The aim of this study is to enhance interdisciplinary learning by rendering complex concepts
more accessible, relevant, and engaging.
pág. 6215
Enhancing educational creativity
Findings could facilitate policymakers with insights into the determinants and initiate effective and
efficient policies to improve artificial intelligence use in education, specifically ChatGPT. Artificial
Intelligence (AI) and natural language processing have significantly impacted education, providing new
opportunities for innovative teaching and learning practices. One of the significant breakthroughs in AI
is the development of the Chat Generative Pre- Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), which can generate
human-like text and conversationally respond to users’ input (Habibi et al., 2023). ChatGPT has great
potential to improve the quality and efficiency of learning practices, such as generating personalized
content, helping with homework, and providing feedback to students (Lund & Wang, 2023). Text
generation: ChatGPT can generate text in a specific style or tone, allowing researchers to easily generate
draft versions of research papers, grant proposals and other written materials (Lund & Wang, 2023).
Question answering: ChatGPT can be fine-tuned to provide answer to domain specific questions,
making it a powerful tool for scholars to find answers quickly and efficiently.
ChatGPT 3.5
Recently, GPT-4, a new version of ChatGPT was released for use by subscribers only. Developers
claimed that the new version has been improved and can perform better compared to GPT-3.5 (OpenAI
et al., 2023). To students, AI chatbots represent a valuable and easily accessible resource that can greatly
aid in problem-solving, summarization, and delivering instant answers to inquiries, distinguishing them
from other available tools. While recent reports, as previously mentioned, have shed light on the
limitations and inaccuracies of ChatGPT in specific problem-solving scenarios, particularly in general
chemistry, there re- mains a noticeable gap in available data regarding ChatGPT’s performance in
addressing organic chemistry questions, particularly those requiring an understanding of structural
notations (Hallal et al., 2023). The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in English
language teaching presents opportunities and challenges for instructors. This study explores the attitudes
of higher education English language instructors towards generative AI tools, their intentions to use
them and the institutional support and professional development necessary to teach and learn with them
(Kohnke et al., 2023). The use of ChatGPT in education has generated considerable interest due to its
potential to enrich the learning experience of students. By providing quick and personalized responses,
pág. 6216
this system could address individual student needs, offer immediate feedback and facilitate the
understanding of complex concepts. In this way, it becomes a promising tool that promotes a student’s
active participation and cognitive advancement by adapting to their learning pace and offering
continuous support in their knowledge acquisition process (Montenegro-Rueda et al., 2023). Despite the
advantages presented in it, it is essential to note that, in current times, the models have serious flaws that
can significantly harm the students' learning process. Although tools like ChatGPT are, at first glance,
abundant sources of information (Sarrazola-Alzate, 2023). This author tells us that artificial intelligence
(AI) is a rapidly developing field. And it is based on GPT-3.5, the latest free version of ChatGPT
available at the time of writing. In addition to dynamic changes in technology, the ethical implications
of ChatGPT and other forms of AI are also advancing rapidly. Readers are advised to constantly check
reliable sources for latest news and updates (Sethi et al., 2020). Teachers or students ask ChatGPT for
ideas about how to extend students’ learning after providing a summary of the current level of
knowledge (e.g., quizzes, exercises). Understanding the role of study strategies and learning difficulties
in students' academic performance to improve educational approaches: a proposal that uses artificial
intelligence, and the most outstanding is ChatGPT 3.5 (Varela et al., 2024).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
How does ChatGPT and other forms of generative AI influence academic research and teaching-
learning?
Generative artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, has a significant impact on academic research,
teaching, and
business practices:
Academic Research:
Research Tasks: GenAI tools can be employed in various research tasks, but it is crucial to understand
the best practices for their credible.
Biases: Researchers need to be aware of the biases inherent in GenAI tools and develop strategies to
cope with them effectively.
Transparency: It is essential for researchers to be transparent about their use of GenAI tools in their
manuscripts and clarify how these tools have been utilized.
pág. 6217
Reliability and Validity: Continuous research is needed to assess the reliability and validity of using
large language models (LLMs) in research tasks.
Teaching:
Integration into Education: Incorporating GenAI into education can enhance students' ability to solve
real-world problems, such as in marketing, by training them to effectively use these tools.
Prompt Engineering: Teaching students how to craft effective prompts and evaluate GenAI output can
improve their understanding and utilization of these technologies.
Ethical Use: Educators should guide students on using GenAI with integrity, transparency, and honesty,
ensuring that assignments reflect original work rather than solely the output of GenAI. In summary,
GenAI tools like ChatGPT have the potential to revolutionize academic research, teaching methods, and
business practices by offering new opportunities for innovation, efficiency, and problem-solving.
However, it is crucial for users to be aware of the limitations, biases, and ethical considerations
associated with the use of these tools.
Why are certain Higher Education Professors not compatible with ChatGPT?
Higher education faculty are not incompatible with ChatGPT; In fact, this model can be useful in various
areas of higher education. However, there are some aspects to consider:
Specific knowledge
ChatGPT has general and broad knowledge until its cut-off date in January 2022, but does not have
access to real-time information or specific databases. Therefore, it may not be up to date on recent events
or very specialized information.
Review and evaluation
The information provided by ChatGPT must be reviewed and evaluated by educational professionals to
ensure its accuracy and relevance in specific contexts.
Adaptation to the educational context
The effectiveness of ChatGPT in higher education depends on how it is used and its integration with
pedagogical methods. It can be a complementary tool for generating ideas, answering questions or as a
source of information, but it cannot completely replace the experience and guidance of teachers.
pág. 6218
Limitations on interaction
ChatGPT does not have the ability to understand context to the same extent as a human teacher.
Although you can generate coherent responses, you do not have a deep or experiential understanding of
the concepts.
Ethics and supervision
It is important to consider ethics in using technologies like ChatGPT in higher education. Furthermore,
supervision and human intervention are essential to ensure a healthy and effective educational
environment.
Despite these considerations, ChatGPT can be valuable in the classroom to provide instant information,
support content generation, and stimulate reflection. However, it must be used in a conscious and
balanced way, together with the experience and guidance of teachers, to make the most of its capabilities
and overcome its limitations.
Tool applied at Higher Level
Technological tools applied in the teaching-learning process with higher education students at the
Higher Technological Institute of San Andres Tuxtla, Veracruz, Mexico. (October-December 2023).
The objective of this work was to investigate which technological tools are most used by students in a
higher education institution and identify how this influence their educational process. The methodology
was quantitative. 25 Industrial Engineering undergraduate students from the 7th semester participated.
The data presented here is directly related to the use of the tools both at the school and individual level.
Among the results obtained, the use of Microsoft Word as a word processor and Microsoft PowerPoint
to make presentations stands out. Regarding the use of videoconferencing, very few teachers and
students use this medium. The communication software that stands out the most is Meet. On the other
hand, the device that students use most for their schoolwork is the computer, but in their daily lives they
mainly use the smartphone. It was also possible to detect that students use more and more technological
tools at school and in their common life and that these do not necessarily agree with those that the teacher
recommends and reviews in class. They themselves take on the task of looking for applications that can
be used for their school activities. This was demonstrated with the educational platforms they use, since
they have not only used the institutional one, but others such as Canvas and Socrative stand out. In this
pág. 6219
research it was observed that, despite the fact that there are various applications for presentations,
students continue to prefer Microsoft Office programs for their schoolwork. This information is relevant
for teachers and can be useful to generate and apply various strategies in the classroom, since for students
these tools are necessary in their educational process and can help improve their academic performance.
How can study strategies integrated into artificial intelligence (AI) tools mitigate the impact of learning
disabilities on academic performance? Achieving optimal academic performance is a multifaceted
challenge that requires a profound understanding of study strategies and their interaction with learning
disabilities (Varela et al., 2024).
Figure 1. Software of Socrative and Canvas mode students (Source: Software Platforms).
Nowadays, talking about technological tools is nothing new. The development of digital applications
has adopted a frenetic pace. In the educational context, since the computer era appeared, it is quite
common for students to use several of these tools when carrying out their academic tasks. Without a
doubt, these resources have made their work easier: the time they use now is less than what they used
previously. Before you had to physically go to the library, for example, now it is no longer necessary to
travel, since consulting information material can be done from home through a laptop or desktop
computer, mobile phone, tablet, in short, any device that is connected to the Internet. That is why we
call this the fourth industrial revolution, or better known as Industry 4.0, thanks to Hyperconnectivity or
IoT and the IIoT. Likewise, these tools have helped in the teaching-learning process, and not only for
students, but also for teachers and parents. Now parents can become more involved in teaching their
children, reaching limits that they could not have imagined some time ago. It is worth mentioning that
sometimes students handle applications better than a teacher, especially if the teacher is older, since they
were born in a time closer to the prevailing technological development. This helps both teachers and
students to be able to learn in a more dynamic way, since the teacher also learns by teaching. The level
pág. 6220
of competitiveness will be higher as information and communication technologies (ICT) are used more
for projects, tasks, and exercises in class. Due to the above, this work investigates the applications that
a student uses at school, whether on the laptop, smartphone, or tablet. The objective is to know these
tools to make them known and that this can help some teachers when choosing which ones to use in the
classroom, and if they do not know them, begin to familiarize themselves with them for their classes.
This is how ICT has helped make work easy and enjoyable. On the other hand, artificial intelligence
refers to the ability of machines to imitate human intelligence and perform tasks that require human
intelligence, such as pattern recognition, decision making, and autonomous learning (Vera, 2023).
Goals
1. Investigate which technological tools are most used by university students in a higher education
institution.
2. Identify how these tools influence your educational process.
3. State the most outstanding tools so that teachers can generate and apply various strategies in the
classroom and with them help improve student performance.
4. Specify the technological tools in which the teacher must continue updating.
Digital resources supporting Higher Education
Figure 2. Dropbox presentation (Source: Network).
This software is for when you save a file to your Dropbox cloud storage, it is uploaded to our secure
servers. Once the upload is complete, the file can be accessed from anywhere, using any computer,
phone, tablet or other compatible device. The student who participated in this project already uses this
mailbox. Dropbox is the space for all your work. You can store and share files, collaborate on projects,
pág. 6221
and bring your ideas to life. And all this alone or with colleagues and clients. With Dropbox, all your
files are also in the cloud and available online.
Figure 3. Edpuzzle (Source: Network).
Edpuzzle; It is an online tool that allows us to edit and modify our own or online videos to adapt them
to the needs of the classroom. Edpuzzle is an easy-to-use platform where you can turn any video into a
lesson. With just one click, you can find video lessons created by other teachers, including formative
assessment! With another click you can adapt that video by inserting your own questions or audio. This
platform is also used by a group of young Industrial Engineering students from the Higher Technological
Institute of San Andrés Tuxtla.
Figure 4. a) ChatGPT 3.5 personal presentation, b) Interface between human and artificial intelligence
(Source: Network).
a)
pág. 6222
b)
Because ChapGPT is a deep learning program, it is useful for extracting new information and improving
its answers over time. This allows your communication strategies to be optimized and adapted to the
needs of your company and your clients. The main functions that ChatGPT has are Answer questions
about a particular topic. Write jokes and poems. Write detailed articles with a set number of words.
ChatGPT is a free online tool, which is trained on millions of writing pages from all corners of the
Internet to understand and answer text-based queries in almost any style you want.
Problematic
The excessive number of digital tools that exist today means that students can use some for school and
others for personal use, in addition to causing teachers not to know which tools to use in class, whether
for work, homework or Projects. The diverse use of these tools can cause the student's performance to
be insufficient when submitting work, tasks, or projects. Various international reports identify education
as a critical area to apply Artificial Intelligence (AI), with the potential to improve access and learning
outcomes. With greater awareness of the applications and possibilities of AI in recent years, it has
become the center of university debates, globally, from academic integrity to curricular adjustments and
many other aspects of the learning experience. In this article we explore the main challenges and
opportunities that higher education faces when integrating AI into the curriculum, with a focus on
ChatGPT, from the perspective of a group of teachers (n=230). Responses are collected through a
structured web-based interview. The results support the integration of AI in higher education.
pág. 6223
RESULTS
The implementation of educational innovation in Mexico, specifically enhancing learning with artificial
intelligence (AI) and the application of ChatGPT in higher education institutions with a perspective of
teacher-student collaboration, has had several significant results. Here are some possible impacts:
Better Learning Experience:
The following table 1 shows a group of students from the Higher Technological Institute of San Andres
Tuxtla, Veracruz, Mexico, (Higher Education), studying Industrial Engineering, who take this academic
level study as a model to know what percentage of students are not familiar with one of the branches of
artificial intelligence (AI), in the academic field, by asking about the use of ChatGPT 3.5. So here the
table shows the percentage of knowledge of said learning tool. 75% have not used this tool through
artificial intelligence (AI). and 25% if hiked.
Table 1. Percentage of ChatGPT knowledge in ES. (Own source).
The impact of a change or improvement on a process is evaluated, and it is required to weight both the
previous state (Before) and the subsequent state (After) in a table. A scale of 1 to 5 is used to assign
values, with 1 indicating low impact and 5 indicating high impact. Evaluation criteria could be
efficiency, effectiveness, quality, customer satisfaction, better writing and better knowledge.
No. STUDENTS AGE EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE WITH
ChatGPT
ACCEPTANCE
BEFORE CHATGPT
1 201U0011 22 Engineering
YES 80% 100%
2 201U0012 23 Engineering NO 40% 85%
3 201U0017 22 Engineering YES 85% 100%
4 201U0020 21 Engineering NO 40% 85%
5 201U0022 21 Engineering NO 35% 90%
6 201U0023 23 Engineering NO 39% 85%
7 231U0679 22 Engineering NO 49% 95%
8 201U0030 21 Engineering NO 40% 95%
9 201U0032 23 Engineering NO 50% 100%
10 201U0033 23 Engineering NO 48% 97%
11 201U0034 21 Engineering NO 60% 100%
12 201U0035 23 Engineering YES 85% 100%
13 201U0036 22 Engineering NO 40% 90%
14 201U0037 22 Engineering NO 20% 80%
15 201U0038 22 Engineering YES 90% 100%
16 201U0039 22 Engineering NO 40% 40%
Percentages yes
25%
Percenteges No
75%
pág. 6224
Table 2. Criteria and increase in learning of ChatGPT 3.5 (Own source).
In this example, each cell in the table has a value assigned for the state before the change (Before) of
the CHATGPT knowledge and for the state after the change (After). Values are assigned by experts or
based on quantitative data, depending on the availability of information and the nature of the criteria
evaluated. Once you've assigned values to each cell, you can average the values for each state (Before
and After) to get an overall measure of the impact of the change on each criterion. You can also perform
a more detailed analysis considering the relative importance of each criterion by assigning specific
weights to each of them. The following graphic 1. shows the behavior of the criteria that are evaluated
to determine the increase in the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) through ChatGPT in higher education
students in Mexico. As mentioned in the name of the article with the collaboration between Teachers-
students.
Graphic. 1. Improving Higher Education with ChatGPT (Own source).
CRITERIOS BEFORE CHATGPT AFTER CHATGPT INCREASE
Efficiency 2 4 2
Effectiveness 3 5 2
Quality 2 4 2
Satisfaction 2 5 3
Best Writing 1 3 2
Best Knowledge 3 5 2
Totals 13 26 13
pág. 6225
Communication facilitation has been achieved
The use of ChatGPT has improved teacher-student communication, allowing instant responses to queries
and facilitating online interaction, especially in virtual learning environments. clarifying that in these
activities there must be values such as honesty and ethics, so that positive results are achieved.
DISCUSSION
This framework provides a solid foundation for a technical and thoughtful discussion about how
artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, can improve learning in higher education institutions and
promote more effective collaboration between faculty and students. A technology discussion on
enhancing learning with artificial intelligence (AI), specifically the application of ChatGPT in higher
education institutions and its impact on teacher-student collaboration, could address several key aspects.
Here is an outline of how that discussion might be structured.
Advantages of the ChatGPT application in learning
Instant information access: Students can get answers to their questions immediately, encouraging
exploration and self-directed learning. Personalization of learning: ChatGPT can adapt to the
individual needs of students, providing resources and explanations tailored to their level of
understanding and learning style. Supporting the teaching process: Teachers can use ChatGPT as a
complementary tool to provide quick feedback and additional resources to students. Encouragement of
creativity and reflection: Interacting with ChatGPT can inspire students to explore new ideas and
perspectives, as well as reflect on their own learning process.
Teacher-student collaboration
Real-time support: ChatGPT can facilitate communication between teachers and students outside of
class hours, giving students access to additional guidance and resources when they need it most.
Encouraging dialogue: Interaction with ChatGPT can serve as a starting point for deeper classroom
discussions, stimulating critical thinking and debate. Student Empowerment: By providing students
with tools to search and understand information independently, ChatGPT can foster a sense of autonomy
and responsibility in the learning process.
With these own comments in the discussion, versions of other authors are demonstrated in the opinion
about the empowerment of ChatGPT in higher education in Mexico. To conclude, ChatGPT can provide
pág. 6226
assistance in many new research areas, and we are still at the very early stage of exploring its application
scope. I have no doubt that AI tools will become a game-changing player in all fields, including our
scientific society. However, there are many challenges in terms of research purposes. So far ChatGPT
is limited by computational constraints, the ability to point out inaccurate information or false faces, and
inferential capability for scientific research. All those limitations may lead to misunderstandings or
misinterpretation. To address these challenges, researchers are immersing themselves to improve the
accuracy and reliability of the model (Cheng, 2023).
CONCLUSION
Add conclusion here. Make sure to address that all objectives are met and emphasize of unique research
contribution (10 font)
Recap of the benefits and challenges of applying ChatGPT in higher education institutions. as well as
encouraging an ethical and thoughtful implementation of AI in the educational environment, with a
focus on improving the learning experience and promoting collaboration between teachers and students.
This framework provides a solid foundation for a technical and thoughtful discussion about how
artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, can improve learning in higher education institutions and
promote more effective collaboration between faculty and students.
This article illuminates the impressive potential of using ChatGPT in this context, since 75% of
respondents from a population of higher-level students have not been familiar with this technological
tool and 25% require more updating, but are familiar. . This highlights the potential of ChatGPT as a
powerful tool for educators, enabling the creation of personalized educational content that can resonate
with students from a wide range of academic backgrounds.
BIBLIOGRAFHIC REFERENCES
Cheng, H. (2023). Challenges and Limitations of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence for Scientific
Research : A Perspective from Organic Materials. 401405.
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Computers and Education : Artificial Intelligence Future research
recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and
Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6(December 2023), 100197.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197
pág. 6227
Einarsson, H., Lund, S. H., & Jónsdóttir, A. H. (2024). Computers and Education : Artificial Intelligence
Application of ChatGPT for automated problem reframing across academic domains. Computers
and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6(December 2023), 100194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100194
Habibi, A., Muhaimin, M., Kopong, B., Gusti, Y., Wahyuni, S., & Octavia, A. (2023). Computers and
Education : Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT in higher education learning : Acceptance and use.
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5(December), 100190.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100190
Hallal, K., Hamdan, R., & Tlais, S. (2023). Computers and Education : Artificial Intelligence Exploring
the potential of AI-Chatbots in organic chemistry : An assessment of ChatGPT and Bard.
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5(October), 100170.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100170
Kohnke, L., Luke, B., & Zou, D. (2023). Computers and Education : Artificial Intelligence Exploring
generative artificial intelligence preparedness among university language instructors : A case
study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5(June), 100156.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100156
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and
libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 2629. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023).
Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review. Computers, 12(8),
113. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153
OpenAI, :, Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D.,
Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., Anadkat, S., Avila, R., Babuschkin, I., Balaji, S., Balcom, V.,
Baltescu, P., Bao, H., Bavarian, M., … Zoph, B. (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. 4, 1100.
http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774
Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D., & Sorescu, A. (2023). Editorial: On ChatGPT and beyond: How
generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice. International Journal
of Research in Marketing, 40(2), 269275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001
pág. 6228
Sarrazola-Alzate, A. (2023). Uso de ChatGPT como herramienta en las aulas de clase. In Revista Eia
(Vol. 20, Issue 40, pp. 123). https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.
Sethi, K., Chauhan, S., & Jaiswal, V. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. 129.
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4763-2.ch001
Steele, J. L. (2023). Computers and Education : Artificial Intelligence To GPT or not GPT ?
Empowering our students to learn with AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence,
5(May), 100160.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100160
Varela, C., Bressane, A., Zwirn, D., Essiptchouk, A., Luiz, F., Carvalho, D. C., Kennety, J., Formiga,
S., & Líliam, C. (2024). Computers and Education : Artificial Intelligence Understanding the role
of study strategies and learning disabilities on student academic performance to enhance
educational approaches : A proposal using artificial intelligence. 6(December 2023).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100196
Vera, F. (2023). Integración de la Inteligencia Artificial en la Educación superior: Desafíos y
oportunidades. Revista Electrónica Transformar Transformar Electronic, 4(1), 118.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-1660