ENHANCING SPEAKING PROFICIENCY:
INNOVATIVE PEDAGOGICAL APPROACHES
FOR THIRD YEAR BACHILLERATO STUDENTS AT
BICENTENARIO 'D7' HIGH SCHOOL
MEJORANDO LA COMPETENCIA ORAL: ENFOQUES PEDAGÓGICOS
INNOVADORES PARA ESTUDIANTES DE TERCER AÑO DE
BACHILLERATO EN LA ESCUELA SECUNDARIA BICENTENARIO 'D7'
Lcdo. Diego Josué Nieto Herrera, MSc.
Universidad Estatal de la Peninsula de Santa Elena, Ecuador
Abg. Roberto Palacios Quinto, MSc.
Universidad Estatal de la Peninsula de Santa Elena, Ecuador
Lcda. María del Carmen Rosado Castro
Investigadora independiente
Ec. César Genaro Almeida Peñafiel
Investigador independiente
Lcda. Verónica Maricruz Gavilanes Moposita
Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Ecuador
pág. 10315
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i4.12184
Enhancing Speaking Proficiency: Innovative Pedagogical Approaches for
Third-Year Bachillerato Students at Bicentenario 'D7' High School
Lcdo. Diego Josué Nieto Herrera, MSc.
1
dnieto3819@upse.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7070-6540
Universidad Estatal de la Peninsula
de Santa Elena -UPSE
Ecuador
Abg. Roberto Palacios Quinto, MSc.
Rpalacios@upse.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3305-9581
Universidad Estatal de la Peninsula
de Santa Elena -UPSE
Ecuador
Lcda. María del Carmen Rosado Castro
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1638-9953
mariadelcarmenrosado@hotmail.com
Investigadora Independiente
Ec. César Genaro Almeida Peñafiel
genaroalmeida1990@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0448-1505
Investigador Independiente
Lcda. Verónica Maricruz Gavilanes Moposita
vm.gavilanes@uta.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4050-4093
Universidad Técnica de Ambato
Ecuador
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the effectiveness of innovative teaching strategies in enhancing the speaking
skills of third-year Bachillerato students at Bicentenario "D7" High School in Ecuador. Employing a
mixed-methods approach, the research combines quantitative assessments of oral proficiency with
qualitative insights from students and teachers. The intervention incorporates a range of speaking-
focused activities based on Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Task-Based Language
Teaching (TBLT) principles, including role-plays, discussions, and technology-integrated exercises.
Pre- and post-intervention speaking assessments, classroom observations, surveys, and interviews are
utilized to evaluate the impact of these strategies. The study aims to address the challenges EFL learners
face in developing fluent and accurate oral communication skills. Findings reveal significant
improvements in students' interaction and pronunciation fluency, with modest gains in vocabulary and
grammar skills. The research highlights the potential of targeted speaking activities and technology
integration in enhancing oral proficiency. Recommendations include expanding successful
interventions, refining assessment methods, and incorporating more grammar-focused exercises. This
study contributes valuable insights to EFL pedagogy, particularly in the Ecuadorian context, offering
practical strategies for improving students' speaking skills.
Keywords: EFL speaking skills, communicative language teaching, task-based learning, oral
proficiency assessment, technology integration in language learning
1
Autor principal
Correspondencia: dnieto3819@upse.edu.ec
pág. 10316
Mejorando la Competencia Oral: Enfoques Pedagógicos Innovadores para
Estudiantes de Tercer Año de Bachillerato en la Escuela Secundaria
Bicentenario 'D7'
RESUMEN
Este estudio investiga la eficacia de estrategias de enseñanza innovadoras para mejorar las habilidades
de expresión oral de estudiantes de tercer año de Bachillerato en la Unidad Educativa Bicentenario "D7"
en Ecuador. Utilizando un enfoque de métodos mixtos, la investigación combina evaluaciones
cuantitativas de competencia oral con perspectivas cualitativas de estudiantes y docentes. La
intervención incorpora una variedad de actividades centradas en el habla basadas en los principios de
Enseñanza Comunicativa del Lenguaje (CLT) y Enseñanza Basada en Tareas (TBLT), incluyendo
juegos de roles, discusiones y ejercicios integrados con tecnología. Se utilizan evaluaciones de
expresión oral pre y post intervención, observaciones en el aula, encuestas y entrevistas para evaluar el
impacto de estas estrategias. El estudio busca abordar los desafíos que enfrentan los estudiantes de
inglés como lengua extranjera en el desarrollo de habilidades de comunicación oral fluidas y precisas.
Los resultados revelan mejoras significativas en la interacción y fluidez de pronunciación de los
estudiantes, con ganancias modestas en habilidades de vocabulario y gramática. La investigación
destaca el potencial de las actividades de habla dirigidas y la integración de tecnología para mejorar la
competencia oral. Las recomendaciones incluyen expandir las intervenciones exitosas, refinar los
métodos de evaluación e incorporar más ejercicios enfocados en la gramática. Este estudio aporta
valiosas perspectivas a la pedagogía del inglés como lengua extranjera, particularmente en el contexto
ecuatoriano, ofreciendo estrategias prácticas para mejorar las habilidades de expresión oral de los
estudiantes.
Palabras clave: habilidades de expresión oral en inglés como lengua extranjera, enseñanza
comunicativa del lenguaje, aprendizaje basado en tareas, evaluación de competencia oral, integración
de tecnología en el aprendizaje de idiomas
Artículo recibido 10 junio 2024
Aceptado para publicación: 28 junio 2024
pág. 10317
INTRODUCTION
In the increasingly interconnected global landscape, proficiency in English as a foreign language (EFL)
has become a crucial asset for students worldwide. Among the various language skills, speaking
proficiency stands out as particularly challenging yet essential for effective communication in academic,
professional, and personal contexts. For third-year Bachillerato students in Ecuador, developing strong
speaking skills in English is not just an academic requirement but a gateway to broader opportunities in
higher education and the global job market.
This research proposal focuses on enhancing speaking proficiency among third-year Bachillerato
students at Bicentenario "D7" High School through innovative pedagogical approaches. The study aims
to address the persistent challenges faced by EFL learners in developing fluent and accurate oral
communication skills. Despite years of English instruction, many students struggle to express
themselves confidently and effectively in spoken English, highlighting the need for targeted
interventions and improved teaching strategies.
The significance of this research lies in its potential to bridge the gap between traditional EFL
instruction and the practical communication needs of students. By implementing and evaluating a range
of speaking-focused activities grounded in established theoretical frameworks such as Communicative
Language Teaching (CLT) and Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT), this study seeks to identify
effective strategies for improving students' oral proficiency. The integration of technology, role-plays,
discussions, and presentations offers a multifaceted approach to language learning that aligns with
contemporary pedagogical best practices.
Moreover, this study adopts a mixed-methods research design, combining quantitative assessments of
speaking skills with qualitative insights into student and teacher experiences. This comprehensive
approach allows for a nuanced understanding of not only the measurable improvements in speaking
proficiency but also the perceptions, challenges, and motivations of the learners themselves. By
exploring the interplay between various teaching strategies and student outcomes, this research aims to
contribute valuable insights to the field of EFL instruction and inform pedagogical practices beyond the
immediate context of the study.
pág. 10318
The findings of this research have the potential to significantly impact EFL curriculum design, teacher
training programs, and classroom practices, particularly in the Ecuadorian educational context. By
identifying effective strategies for enhancing speaking skills, this study can help educators create more
engaging, learner-centered environments that foster confidence and competence in oral communication.
Ultimately, the goal is to equip students with the speaking skills necessary for success in an increasingly
globalized world, opening doors to academic and professional opportunities that require proficiency in
spoken English.
Theoretical Frameworks in Second Language Acquisition
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) has emerged as a prominent approach in second language
acquisition, emphasizing the development of communicative competence through meaningful
interaction. This method prioritizes authentic language use in real-world contexts over rote
memorization of grammatical structures (Brandl, 2020). Key principles of CLT, as outlined by
Ankitaben (2015), include:
Focus on communication: Language is viewed as a tool for interaction rather than a subject to be
studied in isolation.
Authentic materials: The use of real-life language samples to expose learners to natural language
use.
Fluency and accuracy: While accuracy is important, fluency is given equal emphasis to encourage
learners to express themselves freely.
Integration of language skills: Speaking, listening, reading, and writing are often combined in
activities to reflect real-life language use.
Learner-centered approach: Activities are designed to promote active student participation and
autonomy.
Teacher as facilitator: The instructor's role shifts from that of an authority figure to a guide and
resource person.
Mennaai (2013) highlights that CLT aims to develop students' speaking skills by engaging them in
meaningful communicative tasks. This approach often incorporates pair work, group discussions, role-
pág. 10319
plays, and problem-solving activities to simulate real-life communication scenarios. Kusumawati and
Sari (2019) further emphasize the importance of developing speaking materials based on CLT
principles.
Their study demonstrates how CLT-based materials can effectively enhance students' oral
communication skills in an EFL context.
By focusing on practical language use and learner engagement, CLT has proven to be an effective
framework for improving students' speaking proficiency, particularly in EFL settings where
opportunities for authentic language use may be limited (Oradee, 2013).
Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)
Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) is an approach that builds upon the principles of
Communicative Language Teaching, organizing language learning around meaningful tasks that require
learners to use the target language for a communicative purpose. This method emphasizes learning
through doing, promoting active engagement and authentic language use (Nunan, 2015). Tareq (2009)
conducted a comprehensive study on the effectiveness of TBLT in developing speaking skills among
Palestinian secondary EFL students. The research demonstrated significant improvements in students'
oral proficiency and highlighted several key aspects of TBLT:
Authentic context: Tasks are designed to reflect real-world situations, making language learning
more relevant and engaging.
Focus on meaning: Priority is given to successful task completion rather than perfect language form,
encouraging fluency.
Learner-centered: Students take an active role in their learning process, promoting autonomy and
motivation.
Integrated skills: Tasks often require the use of multiple language skills, mirroring real-life
communication scenarios.
pág. 10320
The typical TBLT framework, as described by Oradee (2013), consists of three main phases:
Pre-task
Introduction to the topic and task, potentially including vocabulary preparation or model task
demonstration.
Task cycle
Task planning: Students prepare for the main task, often in pairs or small groups.
Task execution: Learners perform the task, using their language resources.
Reporting: Groups present their task outcomes to the class.
Language focus
Post-task analysis and practice of new language features that emerged during the task.
Salamea-Avila and Fajardo-Dack (2023) further support the effectiveness of TBLT, particularly when
combined with visual and audiovisual materials. Their study with young EFL learners showed that task-
based activities using multimedia resources significantly enhanced students' speaking skills. TBLT has
proven particularly effective in developing speaking skills as it provides learners with opportunities to
use language in meaningful contexts, negotiate meaning, and focus on fluency alongside accuracy. This
approach aligns well with the needs of EFL students, offering a structured yet communicative
framework for language acquisition (Kürüm, 2012).
The Output Hypothesis
The Output Hypothesis, proposed by Merrill Swain, posits that language production (output) plays a
crucial role in second language acquisition. This theory complements input-based approaches by
emphasizing the importance of active language use in developing proficiency, particularly in speaking
skills (Zhang, 2009).
According to Zhang (2009), the Output Hypothesis suggests three main functions of output in language
learning:
Noticing function: Producing language helps learners recognize gaps in their linguistic knowledge,
prompting them to pay attention to specific language features they need to acquire.
Hypothesis-testing function: Output allows learners to experiment with language forms and
structures, testing their understanding of the target language.
pág. 10321
Metalinguistic function: Engaging in language production encourages learners to reflect on their
language use, promoting deeper understanding and retention of linguistic knowledge.
The importance of output in developing speaking skills is further supported by Leong and Ahmadi
(2017), who emphasize that regular opportunities for language production are essential for improving
oral proficiency. They note that output activities help learners:
Develop automaticity in language use
Improve accuracy and fluency
Enhance confidence in using the target language
Kusumawati and Sari (2019) incorporate the principles of the Output Hypothesis in their development
of speaking materials based on Communicative Language Teaching. Their approach emphasizes
creating ample opportunities for students to produce language in meaningful contexts, thereby fostering
the development of speaking skills. Oradee (2013) provides practical applications of the Output
Hypothesis through communicative activities such as discussions, problem-solving tasks, and role-
playing. These activities encourage learners to produce extended discourse, pushing them to utilize their
full linguistic resources and potentially expanding their language capabilities.
In the context of EFL teaching, particularly for developing speaking skills, the Output Hypothesis
underscores the need for instructional approaches that provide frequent, meaningful opportunities for
students to produce language. This focus on output complements input-based strategies, creating a more
balanced and effective approach to language acquisition (Mennaai, 2013).
Effective Strategies for Developing Fluency and Accuracy
Role-plays and simulations
Role-plays and simulations are powerful pedagogical tools for developing speaking skills in EFL
contexts, where opportunities for authentic language use may be limited. These activities provide
learners with structured yet creative environments to practice and improve their oral communication
abilities. Oradee (2013) conducted a study on developing speaking skills using three communicative
activities, including role-playing, and found that these activities significantly improved students'
speaking abilities by providing contextual language practice, encouraging spontaneous language use,
and boosting confidence in using the target language.
pág. 10322
The benefits of role-plays and simulations are multifaceted. They offer authentic language use by
simulating real-life scenarios, allowing students to practice language in context (Kusumawati & Sari,
2019). The 'acting' element can help lower affective filters, making students more comfortable with
speaking and reducing anxiety (Miskam & Saidavli, 2018). Moreover, role-plays can be designed to
incorporate cultural elements, enhancing learners' sociolinguistic competence (Mennaai, 2013). These
activities often combine listening, speaking, and sometimes reading and writing, reflecting real-world
communication and providing integrated skills practice (Brandl, 2020).
Salamea-Avila and Fajardo-Dack (2023) further emphasize the effectiveness of role-plays when
combined with visual and audiovisual materials. Their study demonstrates how such integration can
enhance engagement and language retention, particularly among young EFL learners. To implement
role-plays and simulations effectively, Kürüm (2012) suggests a structured approach involving
preparation, modeling, practice, performance, and feedback. This process ensures that students are
adequately supported throughout the activity and can derive maximum benefit from the experience.
To optimize the impact of role-plays and simulations, Aponte and Pedraza (2018) recommend varying
the complexity and topics of scenarios to cater to different proficiency levels and interests within the
classroom. By incorporating these dynamic, interactive activities into EFL instruction, teachers can
create environments that promote active language use and help students develop the confidence and
skills necessary for effective real-world communication. Through regular engagement in role-plays and
simulations, learners can significantly enhance their speaking abilities, preparing them for authentic
communicative situations beyond the classroom.
Debate and discussion techniques
Debate and discussion techniques are valuable tools in developing speaking skills for EFL learners,
offering structured opportunities for authentic language use and critical thinking. These activities
encourage students to articulate their thoughts, defend their opinions, and engage in meaningful
dialogue, all while improving their oral proficiency. Oradee (2013) found that discussion activities,
along with problem-solving tasks and role-plays, significantly enhanced students' speaking abilities by
promoting active language use in context-rich environments.
pág. 10323
The benefits of debate and discussion techniques are numerous and far-reaching. They provide a
platform for learners to practice extended discourse, improve fluency, and develop argumentation skills
in the target language (Leong & Ahmadi, 2017). These activities also foster critical thinking and
analytical skills as students must research topics, formulate arguments, and respond to counterpoints in
real-time. Moreover, debates and discussions often touch on current events or controversial topics,
which can increase student engagement and motivation to communicate effectively (Mennaai, 2013).
Implementing debate and discussion techniques effectively requires careful planning and guidance from
the instructor. Kürüm (2012) suggests a structured approach that includes topic selection, preparation
time, clear guidelines for participation, and post-activity reflection. This framework ensures that all
students have the opportunity to contribute and benefit from the activity. Additionally, Brandl (2020)
emphasizes the importance of creating a supportive classroom environment where students feel
comfortable expressing their opinions and challenging others' ideas respectfully.
To maximize the effectiveness of debates and discussions, teachers can incorporate various formats and
complexity levels to suit different proficiency levels and learning objectives. For instance, Kusumawati
and Sari (2019) propose using small group discussions as a scaffold for larger debates, allowing students
to build confidence and practice their arguments in a less intimidating setting. Furthermore, integrating
technology, such as online forums or video conferencing tools, can extend discussions beyond the
classroom and provide additional opportunities for language practice (Nguyen & Pham, 2022). By
regularly incorporating debate and discussion techniques into EFL instruction, teachers can create
dynamic, interactive learning environments that not only enhance students' speaking skills but also
prepare them for real-world communication challenges.
Storytelling and presentation skills
Storytelling and presentation skills are essential components in developing effective oral
communication abilities for EFL learners. These techniques not only enhance speaking proficiency but
also foster creativity, confidence, and the ability to engage an audience. Salamea-Avila and Fajardo-
Dack (2023) highlight the effectiveness of storytelling, particularly when combined with visual and
audiovisual materials, in improving young EFL learners' speaking skills. Their research demonstrates
pág. 10324
that these activities provide a rich context for language use, making the learning process more engaging
and memorable.
Storytelling offers numerous benefits for language learners. It encourages the use of descriptive
language, sequencing, and narrative structures, all of which are crucial for effective communication.
Moreover, storytelling activities can be adapted to various proficiency levels, allowing learners to
progress from simple retellings to more complex, original narratives. Kürüm (2012) suggests that
storytelling can be particularly effective in reducing speaking anxiety, as students become engrossed in
the narrative and focus less on their language performance. This reduced anxiety can lead to more fluent
and natural language production.
Presentation skills, on the other hand, prepare students for real-world communication challenges they
may face in academic or professional settings. Leong and Ahmadi (2017) emphasize that regular
opportunities for giving presentations help learners develop confidence, improve their ability to
organize ideas coherently, and enhance their public speaking skills. Presentations also provide a
platform for students to practice using visual aids, body language, and vocal techniques to convey their
message effectively. Brandl (2020) notes that presentation activities can be structured to incorporate
peer feedback and self-reflection, further enhancing the learning experience.
To implement storytelling and presentation activities effectively, teachers should provide clear
guidelines, ample preparation time, and constructive feedback. Oradee (2013) suggests incorporating
these activities into a broader communicative approach, combining them with other speaking tasks to
create a well-rounded language learning experience. Additionally, Nguyen and Pham (2022) highlight
the potential of technology in enhancing these skills, such as using digital storytelling tools or virtual
presentation platforms to add an extra dimension to the learning process.
By integrating storytelling and presentation skills into EFL instruction, educators can create dynamic
learning environments that not only improve students' speaking abilities but also equip them with
valuable communication tools for their future academic and professional endeavors. These activities
encourage learners to move beyond simple language reproduction to more complex, creative, and
personalized forms of expression, ultimately fostering greater language proficiency and communicative
competence.
pág. 10325
The Role of Feedback in Improving Speaking Skills
Types of corrective feedback
Corrective feedback plays a crucial role in the development of speaking skills for EFL learners, serving
to improve accuracy while maintaining fluency. The types and delivery of corrective feedback can
significantly impact learners' language acquisition and confidence in oral communication. Brown
(2004) emphasizes the importance of balancing error correction with positive reinforcement to create a
supportive learning environment that encourages risk-taking in language use.
Various types of corrective feedback have been identified and studied in the context of language
learning. These include explicit correction, recasts, clarification requests, metalinguistic feedback,
elicitation, and repetition. Each type serves a specific purpose and may be effective depending on the
learner's proficiency level, the nature of the error, and the instructional context. For instance, Leong and
Ahmadi (2017) note that implicit feedback, such as recasts, can be particularly effective for more
advanced learners, as it allows for error correction without interrupting the flow of communication.
The timing and manner of delivering corrective feedback are crucial considerations. Immediate
correction may be necessary for preventing the fossilization of errors, but it can also interrupt the
learner's thought process and hinder fluency. Delayed feedback, on the other hand, allows for
uninterrupted communication but may miss the opportunity for immediate reinforcement. Kusumawati
and Sari (2019) suggest that a balanced approach, combining immediate and delayed feedback, can be
most effective in addressing both accuracy and fluency concerns.
Student perceptions of feedback also play a significant role in its effectiveness. Miskam and Saidalvi
(2018) highlight that learners' attitudes towards error correction can impact their willingness to
communicate and their overall language anxiety levels. Therefore, it's crucial for teachers to create a
positive feedback culture in the classroom, where errors are viewed as learning opportunities rather than
failures. Brandl (2020) recommends involving students in the feedback process through peer correction
and self-reflection activities, which can increase learner autonomy and metacognitive awareness.
The choice of feedback type should be tailored to individual learner needs and the specific learning
objectives. For instance, in task-based activities focused on fluency, Oradee (2013) suggests minimizing
interruptions and focusing on communicative effectiveness rather than grammatical accuracy.
pág. 10326
Conversely, in form-focused exercises, more explicit forms of feedback may be appropriate. By
carefully considering the type, timing, and delivery of corrective feedback, educators can create a
balanced approach that supports learners' speaking skill development while maintaining a positive and
encouraging learning environment.
Timing and delivery of feedback
The timing and delivery of feedback are crucial elements in the development of speaking skills for EFL
learners, significantly impacting the effectiveness of error correction and the overall learning process.
Brown (2004) emphasizes that the manner in which feedback is provided can greatly influence learners'
receptiveness to correction and their willingness to take risks in language use. The decision of when
and how to deliver feedback requires careful consideration of various factors, including the learner's
proficiency level, the nature of the task, and the specific learning objectives.
Immediate feedback, provided during or immediately after a speaking activity, has the advantage of
addressing errors in real-time, potentially preventing their reinforcement or fossilization. Leong and
Ahmadi (2017) note that this approach can be particularly effective for addressing pronunciation errors
or simple grammatical mistakes. However, immediate correction also runs the risk of interrupting the
flow of communication and potentially increasing learner anxiety. On the other hand, delayed feedback,
offered after the completion of a speaking task, allows for uninterrupted communication and gives
learners the opportunity to focus on fluency and content delivery. Kusumawati and Sari (2019) suggest
that delayed feedback can be more beneficial for complex linguistic structures or when the primary
focus is on communicative competence rather than grammatical accuracy.
The delivery method of feedback also plays a significant role in its effectiveness. Explicit feedback,
where errors are directly pointed out and corrected, can be clear and unambiguous but may be
demotivating if overused. Implicit feedback, such as recasts or clarification requests, can be less
threatening to learners but may be overlooked or misunderstood. Brandl (2020) advocates for a balanced
approach, combining different feedback types based on the specific needs of the learners and the nature
of the errors being addressed.
Consideration of the learner's affective state is paramount in feedback delivery. Miskam and Saidalvi
(2018) highlight that poorly delivered feedback can increase language anxiety and negatively impact
pág. 10327
learners' confidence and willingness to communicate. To mitigate this, Oradee (2013) suggests creating
a supportive classroom environment where errors are viewed as natural parts of the learning process.
Incorporating peer feedback and self-reflection activities can also help normalize the feedback process
and reduce anxiety associated with teacher-led correction.
The effectiveness of feedback timing and delivery can be enhanced by tailoring it to individual learner
preferences and learning styles. Some students may prefer immediate correction, while others may
benefit more from delayed, written feedback. By being sensitive to these individual differences and
maintaining a flexible approach to feedback, educators can create a more personalized and effective
learning experience. Ultimately, the goal is to provide feedback in a way that supports learners' progress,
boosts their confidence, and encourages continuous improvement in their speaking skills.
Student perceptions of feedback
Student perceptions of feedback play a crucial role in the effectiveness of error correction and the overall
development of speaking skills in EFL contexts. How learners interpret and respond to feedback can
significantly impact their motivation, anxiety levels, and willingness to communicate in the target
language. Miskam and Saidalvi (2018) highlight that students' attitudes towards error correction can
profoundly influence their language learning experience and outcomes. Understanding these
perceptions is essential for educators to tailor their feedback approaches and create a supportive learning
environment.
Research suggests that student preferences for feedback can vary widely based on individual
differences, cultural backgrounds, and proficiency levels. Leong and Ahmadi (2017) note that while
some learners appreciate direct and immediate correction, others may find it intimidating and prefer
more subtle, delayed feedback. This diversity in preferences underscores the importance of adopting a
flexible approach to feedback delivery. Kusumawati and Sari (2019) emphasize the need for teachers
to communicate openly with students about their feedback preferences and to adjust their strategies
accordingly.
The perceived usefulness of feedback is another critical factor influencing student attitudes. Brandl
(2020) points out that learners are more likely to engage positively with feedback when they understand
its purpose and see its relevance to their language learning goals. This highlights the importance of
pág. 10328
providing clear explanations about the feedback process and its potential benefits. Involving students
in the feedback process through peer evaluation and self-reflection activities can also enhance their
understanding and appreciation of constructive criticism.
Cultural factors can significantly shape student perceptions of feedback. In some cultural contexts,
direct criticism may be viewed as face-threatening, while in others, it may be expected and appreciated.
Oradee (2013) suggests that teachers should be culturally sensitive in their feedback approaches and
work towards creating a classroom culture where error correction is viewed as a natural and positive
aspect of language learning. This may involve explicitly discussing cultural differences in feedback
perceptions and establishing shared norms for giving and receiving feedback within the classroom
community.
The emotional impact of feedback on learners cannot be overstated. Brown (2004) emphasizes that
negative experiences with feedback can lead to increased anxiety and reluctance to participate in
speaking activities. Conversely, positive experiences can boost confidence and motivation. To address
this, educators should strive to create a balanced feedback approach that not only addresses errors but
also acknowledges students' strengths and progress. Incorporating praise and encouragement alongside
corrective feedback can help maintain a positive emotional climate and foster a growth mindset among
learners.
By considering and responding to student perceptions of feedback, educators can create more effective
and learner-centred approaches to developing speaking skills. This involves ongoing dialogue with
students, flexibility in feedback methods, cultural sensitivity, and a focus on creating a supportive
learning environment where feedback is viewed as a valuable tool for improvement rather than a source
of anxiety or discouragement.
METHODOLOGY
The methodology for this research proposal employs a mixed-methods approach, combining
quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis within an action research framework. This
design allows for a comprehensive examination of the effectiveness of various speaking strategies in
improving oral proficiency among third-year Bachillerato students at Bicentenario "D7" High School.
The action research model, as described by Kemmis and McTaggart (2000), facilitates iterative
pág. 10329
improvements in teaching strategies throughout the study period, enabling researchers to respond
dynamically to emerging insights and challenges.
Participants will be selected from the target population of third-year Bachillerato students, with efforts
made to include a representative sample of varying proficiency levels. Data collection will involve a
range of instruments including pre- and post-intervention speaking assessments, classroom
observations, student surveys, semi-structured interviews with selected students and teachers, and audio
recordings of student speaking activities. This multi-faceted approach to data gathering aligns with
Creswell and Plano Clark's (2017) recommendations for robust mixed-methods research, ensuring a
rich and diverse dataset that captures both quantitative improvements and qualitative experiences of the
participants.
The intervention will consist of implementing a series of speaking-focused activities based on
established theoretical frameworks such as Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Task-Based
Language Teaching (TBLT). These will include role-plays, simulations, debate and discussion sessions,
and storytelling and presentation assignments. The procedure will begin with an initial assessment of
students' speaking skills, followed by the implementation of the intervention over a specified period,
such as one academic semester. Throughout this period, regular classroom observations and data
collection will take place, allowing for ongoing feedback and adjustments to teaching strategies. The
study will conclude with a final assessment of students' speaking skills and the collection of student and
teacher perceptions through surveys and interviews.
Data analysis will involve both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative analysis will include
a comparison of pre- and post-intervention speaking assessment scores and statistical analysis of survey
responses. Qualitative analysis will consist of thematic analysis of interview transcripts and classroom
observation notes, as well as content analysis of audio recordings to identify improvements in fluency,
accuracy, and complexity. This comprehensive analytical approach will provide a nuanced
understanding of the intervention's impact on students' speaking skills and the factors contributing to
its effectiveness.
Ethical considerations will be prioritized throughout the study, with informed consent obtained from all
participants and their guardians, and measures taken to ensure confidentiality and anonymity.
pág. 10330
Participation will be voluntary, with students having the option to withdraw at any time without penalty.
The study acknowledges certain limitations, including its focus on a specific group of students at one
high school and potential constraints due to the academic calendar. While results may not be universally
generalizable, they will provide valuable insights for similar EFL contexts.
This methodology aims to provide a thorough and rigorous approach to investigating the effectiveness
of various speaking strategies in improving students' oral proficiency. By combining quantitative
measurements with rich qualitative data, the study will offer both statistical evidence of improvement
and in-depth insights into the experiences of students and teachers throughout the intervention process,
contributing valuable knowledge to the field of EFL instruction and speaking skills development.
Instruments based on the selected Research Approach
The research instruments for this study have been carefully selected to align with the mixed-methods
approach, ensuring a comprehensive examination of the effectiveness of speaking strategies in
improving oral proficiency among third-year Bachillerato students. The primary quantitative instrument
will be a standardized speaking assessment, administered both pre- and post-intervention, to measure
objective improvements in students' oral proficiency. This assessment will be designed to evaluate
various aspects of speaking skills, including fluency, accuracy, pronunciation, and communicative
effectiveness, using a rubric adapted from the Common European Framework of Reference for
Languages (CEFR). Additionally, a structured survey will be employed to gather quantitative data on
students' perceptions of their speaking abilities, anxiety levels, and attitudes towards the implemented
strategies. These instruments will provide numerical data for statistical analysis, allowing for a clear
comparison of pre- and post-intervention performance and attitudes.
To complement the quantitative data, several qualitative instruments will be utilized. Semi-structured
interviews with both students and teachers will be conducted to gain in-depth insights into their
experiences with the implemented speaking strategies. These interviews will explore themes such as
perceived effectiveness, challenges encountered, and suggestions for improvement. Classroom
observations will be carried out using a structured observation protocol, focusing on student
engagement, strategy implementation fidelity, and observable improvements in oral communication.
Audio recordings of selected speaking activities will be collected throughout the intervention period,
pág. 10331
providing rich data for content analysis of students' language use over time. These qualitative
instruments, as supported by Creswell and Poth (2018), will offer a nuanced understanding of the
intervention's impact, capturing the complexity of language learning experiences that may not be fully
reflected in quantitative measures alone. The combination of these diverse instruments ensures a holistic
approach to data collection, aligning with the mixed-methods research design and enabling a
comprehensive evaluation of the speaking strategies' effectiveness.
RESULTS
Figure 1 How would you rate the LiveWorksheet user interface in terms of ease of use?
Note: Elaborated by Researchers.
Very Easy: 14.8% of the respondents (4 students) found the LiveWorksheet interface very easy to
use.
Easy: Approximately 37% of the respondents (13 students) considered the interface easy to use.
Neutral: A majority of 48.1% (13 students) expressed a neutral stance regarding the ease of use of
the LiveWorksheet interface.
Difficult: None of the respondents rated the interface as difficult.
Very Difficult: None of the respondents found the LiveWorksheet interface very difficult to use.
In summary, the majority of students expressed a neutral opinion, with a notable proportion perceiving
the LiveWorksheet interface as easy to use. Importantly, none of the respondents found the interface
difficult or very difficult, indicating an overall positive perception of the ease of use of LiveWorksheet's
user interface among the surveyed students.
pág. 10332
Figure 2 Do you think LiveWorksheet has improved your learning experience?
Note: Elaborated by Researches.
A notable majority of 51.9% of the respondents (15 students) reported that LiveWorksheet has
significantly improved their learning experience. This suggests that a significant portion of students
perceive LiveWorksheet as a positive contributor to their educational journey. Yes, it has improved
slightly almost an equally substantial percentage, 48.1% (15 students), acknowledged that
LiveWorksheet has improved their learning experience to a lesser extent. Importantly, none of the
respondents reported a negative impact, indicating a positive reception of LiveWorksheet among the
surveyed students.
Limitations
The study's duration may be constrained by the school's academic calendar, including extracurricular
activities, holidays, and unforeseen disruptions, potentially impacting the intervention's depth and the
ability to assess long-term effects. Additionally, varying levels of student access to and proficiency with
technology may influence participation in technology-integrated learning activities, with some students
experiencing difficulties using applications like Flipgrid and Liveworksheet. Outdated devices may also
contribute to inconsistent results. Furthermore, the diverse range of student proficiency levels presents
challenges in implementing planned activities efficiently, potentially hindering the optimal achievement
of educational objectives.
CONCLUSIONS
pág. 10333
The intervention demonstrated a positive impact on participants' communication skills, with a notable
reduction in standard deviation suggesting more consistent improvement across the group. Significant
enhancements were observed in interaction and pronunciation fluency, while vocabulary-grammar
skills showed modest improvement. However, the lack of substantial progress in grammatical skills
may be attributed to insufficient grammar-focused exercises within the intervention. The research
methodology, employing various empirical data collection techniques, enabled a comprehensive
analysis of students' linguistic performance across multiple dimensions, allowing researchers to identify
specific areas for improvement in learners' speaking abilities.
Recommendations
Given the positive outcomes in interaction and pronunciation fluency, it is advisable to continue and
potentially expand the intervention, particularly the integration of Flipgrid and Liveworksheet
technologies, which proved beneficial for quiet and shy third baccalaureate students. To address the
discrepancy in grammar skill development, it is suggested to assess grammatical competence separately
from other language domains, enabling more targeted instruction and progress monitoring.
Incorporating formative assessments specifically focused on grammatical structures could also be
beneficial. Finally, to enhance the validity and effectiveness of the assessment tools, collaboration with
language education specialists is recommended for future studies, ensuring a more nuanced evaluation
of language proficiency.
BIBLIOGRAFHIC REFERENCES
Ankitaben A. (2015). Characteristics and Principles of Communicative Language Teaching.
International Journal of Research in Humanities & Soc. Sciences, 3(7).
https://www.raijmr.com/ijrhs/wp-
content/uploads/2017/11/IJRHS_2015_vol03_issue_07_10.pdf
Aponte, J and Pedraza,D. (2018). Factors that affect the development of the speaking skills in a foreign
language of three teenage students [Master's thesis]. chrome-
extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/
http://biblioteca.usbbog.edu.co:8080/Biblioteca/BDigital/168232.pdf
pág. 10334
Ashton-Hay, S. (2010). Collaborative learning methodology, types of interactions, and
techniques.Education in a competitive and globalizing world. New York: Nova.
Beverly, A. H. (2007). The role of grammar in improving student’s writing. Retrieved October 1,
2007, from http://www.sadlier-oxford.com/docs/language/paper_chin.cfm
Brandl, K. (2020). Communicative language teaching in action: Putting principles to work. Cognella
Academic Publishing.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principle and classroom practices. New York: Pearson
Education https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SiELE/article/view/2232/2161
Brown, H. D. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching 4th edition. NY: Longman2000.
Comprehensible input and Krashen's theory. (n.d.). Cambridge Core.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-classics-teaching/article/comprehensible-
input-and-krashens-theory/2308987050E8D31E3986B530D4B02F6F#sec6
Difilippantonio-Pen, Annelise. (2020). Flipgrid and Second Language Acquisition Using Flipgrid to
Promote Speaking Skills for English Language Learners. In BSU Masters Theses and Projects.
Item 75. Available at https://vc.bridgew.edu/theses/75
Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. Harlow, Longman
Getting started with Flipgrid. (2020). Flipgrid. Retrieved April 20, 2020, from
http://blog.flipgrid.com/gettingstarted
Hakim, Rosniati & Ritonga, Mahyudin & Khadijah, & Susanti, Wetti. (2020). Implementation of
Contextual Teaching and Learning in Islamic Education at Madrasah Diniyah. Journal of
Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems. 12. 3326-3332.
10.5373/JARDCS/V12I2/S20201455. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/50638204/4696-
13605-1-PB-libre.pdf?1480525297=&response-content-
disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DEuropean_Scientific_Journal_The_role_of.pdf&Expire
s=1688319422&Signature=Uq7f1u30GoQz2aAbw2B4C8BUCo7dp0KMMCJfYhq4FvEh7Va
Ffs34OvLBScO7RX-uDH-oKq9YhOSZdTM2gIUEZmo6MDWlOs9GFZmU~hiO5J-
HGCgsbciLUyM6vg4Jo0VAg4ye5POXRqCfmk2~HB3uiu8Fr-
~RMy~e4AO5TMnzjIoqDmtRZNPr7-wrSlMl98Bg4iemFleROtwMZ-
pág. 10335
TNsprwbbaekVjPOR1c9XIbLATqd0HS1A8vvIT24vrEZvg~88Akim7RdbYtillrJwRuKnYG
MhSbXjVyKO~grocVp7NmbRy-Bee0gwemMhxDCDybFutvCKzPx7twG3-
WYpShnQ26Dw__&Key-Pair-
Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503439.pdf
https://vuir.vu.edu.au/1492/1/Songsiri.pdf
Kürüm, E. (2012). Teaching Speaking Skills [Doctoral dissertation].
https://www.academia.edu/download/57371702/HowtoTeachSpeaking.pdf
Kusumawati, F. P. and Sari, R. P. (2019). Developing Speaking Material for Teaching Speaking Based
on Communicative Language Teaching for Second Semester Students of English Education
Study Program Muhammadiyah University of Metro. Intensive Journal, 2(1) Retrieved from
http://ois.uniskaim.ac.id/index.php/EJB
Leong, L., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2017). An analysis of factors influencing learners’ English Speaking skills.
International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 34-41.
https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijree.2.1.34
Mennaai S. (2013). Developing the Students’ Speaking Skill through Communicative Language
Teaching [Master's thesis].
http://archives.univ-biskra.dz/bitstream/123456789/4740/1/SE%20143.pdf
Ministerio de Educación. (2023). MINEDUC-MINEDUC-2023-00063-A: Evaluación y Promoción.
[00063-A]. Quito, Ecuador.
Miskam, N.N. and Saidalvi, A. (2018). Factors Affecting Undergraduates‟ English Language Anxiety.
International Journal of English and Education, 7 (4), 15-28
Mustafa, A. (2023). The Impact of Speaking Anxiety on the Development of Communication Skills. Tishk
International University.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369560397_The_Impact_of_Speaking_Anxiety_on_
the_Development_of_Communication_Skills
Nguyen, T. D., & Pham, V. P. (2022). Effects of using technology to support students in developing
speaking skills. International Journal of Language Instruction, 1(1), 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.22111
pág. 10336
Nugroho, Y. (2012). Improving Students’ Vocabulary Mastery Using Flashcards. Pediatric Infectious
Disease Journal, 31(2), 206–208.
Nunan, D. (2015). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Oradee, T. (2013). Developing speaking skills using three communicative activities (Discussion,
problem-solving, and role-playing). International Journal of Social Science and Humanity,
533-535. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2012.v2.164
Puspita, S., Mega, I., Asri W., Insih, W., Siti F. A. and Desi, R. (2022). Effectiveness of SETS-Based
Electronic Student Worksheet (E-LKPD) to Improve Student Learning Outcomes. Jurnal
Pendidikan Sains (Jps) 10(1):9. doi: 10.26714/jps.10.1.2022.9-14.
Rizka, K. (2021). English Speaking Skills Acquisition of Teenagers in Sabang [Unpublished master's
thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri AR-Raniry.
Salamea-Avila, M. J., & Fajardo-Dack, T. (2023). Developing Speaking Skills in EFL Young Learners
through Visual and Audiovisual Materials. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 6(S1),
338-349 https://remca.umet.edu.ec/index.php/REMCA/article/download/662/668
Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: Instructional
implications and teachers' professional development. English Language Teaching, 3(4).
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p237
Spence, C. (2022, April 29). Collaborative learning: The science behind it, and why it works. World of
Better Learning | Cambridge University Press.
https://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/2022/04/29/collaborative-learning-science-behind-it/
Tareq, M. (2009). The Effect of Task-Based Language Teaching on Developing Speaking Skills among
the Palestinian Secondary EFL Students in Israel and Their Attitudes towards English
Developing Speaking Skills among the Palestinian Secondary EFL Students in Israel and Their
Attitudes towards English [Doctoral dissertation].
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/TareqMurad/publication/371540519_The_Effect_of_Tas
kBased_Language_Teaching_on_Developing_Speaking_Skills_among_the_Palestinian_Seco
ndary_EFL_Students_in_Israel_and_Their_Attitudes_towrds_English_The_Effect_of_TaskB
ased_Language_Te/links/6489905d9bc5e436682f67d7/The-Effect-of-Task-Based-Language-
pág. 10337
Teaching-on-Developing-Speaking-Skills-among-the-Palestinian-Secondary-EFL-Students-
in-Israel-and-Their-Attitudes-towards-English-The-Effect-of-Task-Based-Language-Te.pdf
Teaching strategies. (2021, May 6). ECU Intranet.
https://intranet.ecu.edu.au/learning/curriculum-design/teaching-strategies
What is comprehensible input and why does it matter for language learning? (2023, January 13).
Leonardo English | Learn English with Podcasts.
https://www.leonardoenglish.com/blog/comprehensible-input
Ying, S. (2019). A study on the application of input hypothesis in English teaching of junior high school.
International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7(6), 364.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190706.26
Zarandy, S.Z.A and Rahbar, B. Enhancing Speaking Ability through Intervening Scaffolding Strategies,
Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6 (11), 2016.
Zhang, S. (2009). The role of input, interaction, and output in the development of oral fluency. English
Language Teaching, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n4p91