pág. 12379
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what
remains uncertain: a critical review. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., 14(1).
Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Mart\’\inez-
Herráiz, J.-J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes.
Comput. Educ., 63, 380–392.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive
Sampling. *American Journal of Theoretical and Ap-Plied Statistics*, 5(1), 1–4.
Faiella, F., & Ricciardi, M. (2015). Gamification and learning: A review of issues and research. Journal
of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11(3).
Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2016). Does gamification work? –a literature review of empirical
studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii In-ternational Conference on System
Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3025–3034).
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2018). Corrigendum to assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom:
A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and aca-
demic performance computers & education 80 (2015) pages 152-161. Comput. Educ., 127, 298.
Huang, W. H., & Soman, D. (2013). Gamification of education. Research Report Series: Behavioural
Economics in Action.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning.
*Active Learning in Higher Education*, 6(1), 26–37.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualita-tive Research Interview-
ing. SAGE Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation.
Redecker, C. (2013). The use of ICT for the assessment of key competences. European Journal of Ed-
ucation, 48(1), 79–96.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new
directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol., 25(1), 54–67.