Ciencia y Relexión - Revista Científica Multidisiplinaria
ISSN 3045-5537 (en línea) Julio-Diciembre, 2024, Volumen 3, Número 2 Pág 622
reinforcement, and the creation of a supportive, engaging classroom environment, students
showed notable improvement in the posttest. This improvement was evident in higher scores
across all speaking components, suggesting that the strategies were successful in boosting
their speaking abilities. Furthermore, students reported positive feedback regarding the
strategies, emphasizing their increased motivation and confidence in speaking English. This
discussion explores the changes observed from pretest to posttest and investigates the
connection between motivational strategies and the development of students' speaking skills.
This research examines the impact of motivational strategies on enhancing English-speaking
skills among 10th-grade high school students in a public. The pretest results indicated that
students had limited speaking proficiency in areas such as pronunciation, interactive
communication, grammar, vocabulary, and comprehension. However, following the
application of motivational teaching strategies, including task-based learning, positive
reinforcement, and the creation of a supportive, engaging classroom environment, students
showed notable improvement in the posttest. This improvement was evident in higher scores
across all speaking components, suggesting that the strategies were successful in boosting
their speaking abilities. Furthermore, students reported positive feedback regarding the
strategies, emphasizing their increased motivation and confidence in speaking English. This
discussion explores the changes observed from pretest to posttest and investigates the
connection between motivational strategies and the development of students' speaking skills.
As reported in the Results section of the Shapiro there was a statistically significant increase
in the posttest after the intervention plan. This could be good evidence that cooperative
learning worked very well on students’ cognitive dimension regarding the different
components of speaking. The pretest data showed a W-value of 0.961 with a p-value of
0.120, indicating normal distribution. In contrast, the posttest data presented a W-value of
0.933 and a p-value of 0.011, suggesting that the posttest data deviated from normality. This