Impulsando la Educación STEAM desde la Gestión Escolar Efectiva: Un Modelo de Banco de Germoplasma Vegetal para el Desarrollo Sostenible y el Fortalecimiento de las Habilidades STEAM
Resumen
Este estudio examina la implementación del modelo STEAM (Ciencia, Tecnología, Ingeniería, Artes y Matemáticas) en la Institución Educativa El Tagüi, Colombia, destacando cómo la integración de estas disciplinas puede mejorar la educación y responder a desafíos globales y locales. A través de un enfoque mixto, cuantitativo y cualitativo, se evalúa el impacto de un banco de germoplasma vegetal como herramienta educativa y funcional. La gestión escolar efectiva ha sido crucial, facilitando la implementación de estas iniciativas mediante la coordinación de recursos, la capacitación docente y la integración curricular. Los resultados muestran mejoras significativas en la comprensión y aplicación de conocimientos interdisciplinarios por parte de los estudiantes del grupo experimental en comparación con un grupo de control. Además, el proyecto contribuyó al desarrollo sostenible local promoviendo la seguridad alimentaria y la conservación de la biodiversidad.
Descargas
Citas
Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Integrating Western and Aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31(3), 337-355.
Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. Sage Publications.
Acosta Silva, S., & Paredes Cruz, I. (2022). Prevención y tratamiento de la litiasis renal: Medidas dietéticas y farmacológicas. Revista Científica De Salud Y Desarrollo Humano, 3(1), 148-170. https://doi.org/10.61368/r.s.d.h.v3i1.50
Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5/6), 23-37.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43.
Bennett, E. M., Solan, M., Biggs, R., McPhearson, T., Norström, A. V., Olsson, P., ... & Peterson, G. D. (2018). Bright spots: Seeds of a good Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(8), 441-448.
Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40-47.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro & J. Morgan (Eds.), STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd ed., pp. 1-6). Sense Publishers.
Cobo, C., & Valdivia, C. S. (2017). Aprendizaje basado en proyectos. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Publicación del Instituto de Docencia Universitaria.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
FAO. (2010). The second report on the state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Rome, Italy: FAO. Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/3/i1500e/i1500e00.htm
Fink, A. (2017). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Freeman, S., & Vasconcelos, E. (2019). Active learning and its impact on educational outcomes: A review from science education. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 457-477.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: Implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416-438.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Khine, M. S., & Areepattamannil, S. (Eds.). (2019). STEM Education in the Junior Secondary: The State of the Art and Visions for the Future. Springer.
Krajcik, J., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 275-297). Cambridge University Press.
Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. Laboratory for Student Success, Temple University.
López, M. (2023). El Manejo de las Transacciones Online y la Protección al Consumidor. Emergentes - Revista Científica, 3(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.60112/erc.v3i1.22
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Morales Fretes , C. D. (2023). Estrategias motivacionales en el desempeño laboral de los empleados en empresas de la Ciudad de Pilar 2023. Sapiencia Revista Científica Y Académica , 3(2), 62-74. https://doi.org/10.61598/s.r.c.a.v3i2.51
Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the joy in the unknown”: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410-426.
Rodríguez, C., & Molina, S. (2020). Educational challenges and opportunities in Latin America: The case of Colombia. International Journal of Educational Development, 75, 102182.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13.
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge.
Sieber, J. E. (2012). Planning ethically responsible research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Smith, G. A., & Sobel, D. (2020). Place- and community-based education in schools. Routledge.
Spillane, J. P. (2012). Distributed leadership (Vol. 4). John Wiley & Sons.
Stevenson, R. B. (2019). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 951-965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1250150
Serrano Ruiz, R. E. (2023). Prevalencia de infecciones TORCH en mujeres embarazadas del cantón Olmedo: Un llamado a la prevención y control. Estudios Y Perspectivas Revista Científica Y Académica , 3(1), 174-194. https://doi.org/10.61384/r.c.a.v3i1.29
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage Publications.
Torres, A., & García, E. (2018). Sustainable development and educational challenges in rural Colombia. Journal of Sustainability Education, 5, 44-58.
UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. UNESCO. Disponible en: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Zhao, Y. (2017). What works may hurt: Side effects in education. Teachers College Press.
Derechos de autor 2024 Miguel Andrés Estupiñan Lizarazo, Helver Garcia Rodriguez
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0.
.jpg)
.png)
