Educational innovation in virtual environments: a systematic review of methodological strategies post-covid-19 (2020–2025)

Palabras clave: educational innovation, active methodologies, virtual education, systematic review, post-COVID-19

Resumen

This study provides a systematic and detailed review of educational innovation in virtual learning environments, emphasizing the use of active methodologies during the post-COVID-19 period (2020–2025). Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research combines a qualitative documentary review guided by PRISMA 2020 with empirical data collection through surveys and semi-structured interviews involving students and university instructors in Ecuador. Searches were conducted in major databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, SciELO, Redalyc, and Google Scholar, to locate empirical and theoretical studies related to higher education, virtual teaching, and active learning strategies. Findings show that gamification, flipped classrooms, project-based learning, and collaborative learning effectively enhance student motivation, engagement, autonomy, and academic achievement. Key challenges remain, such as the digital divide, limited teacher training, insufficient institutional support, and sustainability concerns for implementing innovative pedagogies. Comparisons of student and teacher perspectives reveal alignment regarding the benefits of active methodologies but differences in perceived obstacles: students emphasize technical and access difficulties, whereas instructors focus on professional development and institutional support gaps. The study concludes that context-sensitive integration of active methodologies in hybrid learning environments can substantially improve higher education quality in Ecuador, provided strong institutional policies, ongoing professional development, and inclusive digital infrastructures are implemented. Implications for curriculum design, policy-making, and future research are also discussed, highlighting the need for longitudinal and comparative studies that include both student and teacher perspectives to develop sustainable, culturally appropriate hybrid learning models.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Bonilla, J., & Ortega, F. (2022). Metodologías activas en la educación superior virtual: Retos y posibilidades post-pandemia. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 24(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2022.24.1.2932

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083

Cabero-Almenara, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2021). La gamificación como metodología activa en la educación superior. RIED, 24(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.27855

Crespo, M., & Morales, L. (2021). Desafíos de la docencia universitaria en Ecuador durante la pandemia COVID-19. Revista Conrado, 17(80), 123–130.

García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Transformación digital en las universidades: Más allá de la enseñanza remota. Campus Virtuales, 10(1), 1–14.

González-Calvo, G., Barba-Martín, R., & Bores-García, D. (2022). Formación docente y educación digital post-COVID. Education Sciences, 12(4), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040271

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 27, 1–12.

INEVAL. (2021). Informe nacional de evaluación educativa en contexto de pandemia. Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa. https://www.evaluacion.gob.ec

Martínez, D., & Pérez, S. (2023). Estrategias metodológicas activas y su impacto en la motivación del estudiante universitario. Journal of Learning Styles, 16(32), 88–104.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guardia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y

Rodríguez, A., & López, M. (2022). Innovación y docencia universitaria en entornos híbridos post-pandemia. Educación XX1, 25(2), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.30533

Salinas, J., de Benito, B., & Cabero, J. (2023). Aprendizaje activo y tecnologías emergentes: Nuevas rutas para la educación superior virtual. RIED, 26(2), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.26.2.34025

Torres, C., & Ramírez, P. (2021). Retos y perspectivas de la educación superior virtual en América Latina. Revista Latinoamericana de Innovación Educativa, 12(3), 77–95.

UNESCO. (2022). Reimaginar nuestros futuros juntos: Un nuevo contrato social para la educación. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

Zubillaga, A., & Gortazar, L. (2021). Aprendizaje invertido y blended learning en tiempos de pandemia. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 21(65), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.60 18/red.445471

Cabero-Almenara, J., Llorente-Cejudo, M. C., & Marín-Díaz, V. (2023). Innovación educativa y metodologías activas en la educación superior: Tendencias recientes. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 14(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959e014

Bozkurt, A., Koseoglu, S., & Singh, L. (2022). Conceptualizing education in a post-COVID-19 era: Learning from the global experience. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6551843

Publicado
2025-09-15
Cómo citar
Jiménez Mendieta , R. E. (2025). Educational innovation in virtual environments: a systematic review of methodological strategies post-covid-19 (2020–2025). Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 9(4), 7857-7866. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i4.19372
Sección
Ciencias de la Educación