Importancia del Método Greulich and Pyle en la Práctica Clínica Una Revisión Sistemática

Palabras clave: método de Greulich y Pyle, evaluación de madurez esquelética, radiología pediátrica, crecimiento y desarrollo óseo, maduración ósea y comparación de métodos

Resumen

La evaluación de la edad ósea en niños y adolescentes, es importante en la práctica clínica, con la finalidad de no tener variabilidad con la edad biológica; el método de Greulich and Pyle (GP) es la más empleada, práctica y versátil en su aplicación, existiendo también métodos automatizados con Inteligencia Artificial (IA). Se analiza y evalúa la eficacia con respecto a otros métodos, determinando su relevancia en la práctica clínica actual. Se realizaron búsqueda en SCOPUS, GOOGLE SCHOLAR y PUB MED, obteniendo 16 estudios que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, encontrándose que GP es una herramienta útil, eficaz y precisa para la evaluación de la edad ósea, con una alta fiabilidad y validez interobservador e intraobservador. Algunos estudios señalaron que GP puede subestimar la edad ósea en algunos grupos de población. Finalmente, se determinó un alto grado de importancia de GP en la práctica clínica encontrando también métodos automatizados.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Mughal AM, Hassan N, Ahmed A. Bone age assessment methods: A critical review. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(1):211-5. doi:10.12669/pjms.301.4295.

Pinchi V, De Luca F, Ricciardi F, Focardi M, Piredda V, Mazzeo E, Norelli GA. Skeletal age estimation for forensic purposes: A comparison of GP, TW2 and TW3 methods on an Italian sample. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;238:83-90. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.02.030.

Son SJ, Song Y, Kim N, Do Y, Kwak N, Lee MS, Lee BD. TW3-based fully automated bone age assessment system using deep neural networks. IEEE Access. 2019;7:33346-33358. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905855.

Shin NY, Lee BD, Kang JH, Kim HR, Oh DH, Lee BI, Kim SH, Lee MS, Heo MS. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of a TW3-based fully automated bone age assessment system using deep neural networks. Imaging Sci Dent. 2020 Sep;50(3):237-243. doi: 10.5624/isd.2020.50.3.237.

Zhou XL, Wang EG, Lin Q, Dong GP, Wu W, Huang K, et al. Diagnostic performance of convolutional neural network-based Tanner-Whitehouse 3 bone age assessment system. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Mar;10(3):657-667. doi: 10.21037/qims.2020.02.20.

Geng J, Zhang W, Ge Y, Wang L, Huang P, Liu Y, Shi J, Zhou F, Ma K, Blake GM, et al. Inter-rater variability and repeatability in the assessment of the Tanner-Whitehouse classification of hand radiographs for the estimation of bone age. Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Dec;53(12):2635-2642. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04664-w.

Zhang J, Lin F, Ding X. Automatic determination of the Greulich-Pyle bone age as an alternative approach for Chinese children with discordant bone age. Horm Res Paediatr. 2016;86(2):83-9. doi:10.1159/000446434.

Gao C, Hu C, Qian Q, Li Y, Xing X, Gong P, Lin M, Ding Z. Artificial intelligence model system for bone age assessment of preschool children. Pediatr Res. 2024;96(7):1822-1828. doi:10.1038/s41390-024-03282-5.

Gräfe D, Beeskow AB, Pfäffle R, Rosolowski M, Chung TS, DiFranco MD. Automated bone age assessment in a German pediatric cohort: agreement between an artificial intelligence software and the manual Greulich and Pyle method. Eur Radiol. 2024 Jul;34(7):4407-4413. doi:10.1007/s00330-023-10543-0.

Pan I, Baird GL, Mutasa S, Merck D, Ruzal-Shapiro C, Swenson DW, Ayyala RS. Rethinking Greulich and Pyle: A Deep Learning Approach to Pediatric Bone Age Assessment Using Pediatric Trauma Hand Radiographs. Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Jul 29;2(4):e190198. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020190198.

Wang YM, Tsai TH, Hsu JS, Chao MF, Wang YT, Jaw TS.. Automatic assessment of bone age in Taiwanese children: A comparison of the Greulich and Pyle method and the Tanner and Whitehouse 3 method. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;36(11):937-943. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12268.

Gertych A, Zhang A, Sayre J, Pospiech-Kurkowska S, Huang HK. Bone age assessment of children using a digital hand atlas. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007;31(4-5):322-331. doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.02.012.

Sariyilmaz K, Abali S, Ziroglu N, Cingoz T, Ozkunt O, Abali ZY, Kalayci CB, Hayretci M, Semiz S. Interdisciplinary and intraobserver reliability of the Greulich-Pyle method among Turkish children. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2023;36(12):1181-5. doi:10.1515/jpem-2023-0303.

Breen MA, Tsai A, Stamm A, Kleinman PK. Bone age assessment practices in infants and older children among Society for Pediatric Radiology members. Pediatric Radiology. 2016;46(9):1269-1274. doi:10.1007/s00247-016-3618-7.

Martín Pérez IM, Martín Pérez SE, Vega González JM, Molina Suárez R, García Hernández AM, Rodríguez Hernández F, Herrera Pérez M. The Validation of the Greulich and Pyle Atlas for Radiological Bone Age Assessments in a Pediatric Population from the Canary Islands. Healthcare (Switzerland). 2024;12(18):1847. doi:10.3390/healthcare12181847.

Cavallo F, Mohn A, Chiarelli F, Giannini C. Evaluation of bone age in children: a mini-review. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:580314. doi:10.3389/fped.2021.580314.

Van Rijn RR, Lequin MH, Thodberg HH. Automatic determination of Greulich and Pyle bone age in healthy Dutch children. Pediatric Radiology. 2009;39(6):591-597. doi:10.1007/s00247-008-1090-8.

Dahlberg PS, Mosdøl A, Ding Y, Bleka Ø, Rolseth V, Straumann GH, et al. A systematic review of the agreement between chronological age and skeletal age based on the Greulich and Pyle atlas. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:2936-2948. doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5923-5.

Uddin SZ, Zarif P, Bashir N. Epiphyseal fusion of radius and ulna at wrist joint in male and female in the population of Lahore - An age estimation criterion. Med Forum Monthly. 2018;29(6):85-7.

Martín Pérez SE, Martín Pérez IM, Vega González JM, Molina Suárez R, León Hernández C, Rodríguez Hernández F, Herrera Pérez M. Precision and accuracy of radiological bone age assessment in children among different ethnic groups: a systematic review. Diagnostics. 2023;13(19):3124. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13193124.

Klünder-Klünder M, Espinosa-Espindola M, Lopez-Gonzalez D, Loyo MS-C, Suárez PD, Miranda-Lora AL. Skeletal maturation in the current pediatric Mexican population. Endocrine Practice. 2020;26(10):1053-1061. doi:10.4158/EP-2020-0047.

Lee BD, Lee MS. Automated Bone Age Assessment Using Artificial Intelligence: The Future of Bone Age Assessment. Korean J Radiol. 2021;22(5):792-800. doi:10.3348/kjr.2020.0941.

Thodberg HH, Thodberg B, Ahlkvist J, Offiah AC. Autonomous artificial intelligence in pediatric radiology: the use and perception of BoneXpert for bone age assessment. Pediatr Radiol. 2022;52(7):1338-46. doi:10.1007/s00247-022-05295-w.

Özmen E, Özen Atalay H, Uzer E, Veznikli M. A comparison of two artificial intelligence-based methods for assessing bone age in Turkish children: BoneXpert and VUNO Med-Bone Age. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2024 Sep 2. doi: 10.4274/dir.2024.242790.

Halabi SS, Prevedello LM, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Mamonov AB, Bilbily A, Cicero M, et al. The RSNA pediatric bone age machine learning challenge. Radiology. 2019;290(2):498-503. doi:10.1148/radiol.2019190344.

Pose Lepe G, Villacrés F, Silva Fuente-Alba C, Guiloff S. Correlación en la determinación de la edad ósea radiológica mediante el método de Greulich y Pyle versus la evaluación automatizada utilizando el software BoneXpert. Rev. chil. pediatr. 2018;89(5):606-611. doi:10.4067/S0370-41062018000500606.

Kim JK, Park D, Chang MC. Assessment of bone age based on hand radiographs using regression-based multi-modal deep learning. Life. 2024;14(6):774. doi:10.3390/life14060774.

Kim JR, Shim WH, Yoon HM, Hong SH, Lee JS, Cho YA, Kim S. Computerized bone age estimation using deep learning based program: evaluation of the accuracy and efficiency. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(6):1374-1380. doi:10.2214/AJR.17.17663.

Bowden JJ, Bowden SA, Ruess L, Adler BH, Hu H, Krishnamurthy R. Validation of automated bone age analysis from hand radiographs in a North American pediatric population. Pediatr Radiol. 2022;52(7):1347-55. doi:10.1007/s00247-022-05310-0.

Uddin NS, Hasan W, Wasid M, Ali R. Deep learning for bone age assessment: Current status and future prospects. Artif Intell Biomed Mod Healthc Inform. 2025;193-201.

Zhao K, Ma S, Sun Z, Liu X, Zhu Y, Xu Y, Wang X. Effect of AI-assisted software on inter-and intra-observer variability for the X-ray bone age assessment of preschool children. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22(1):644. doi:10.1186/s12887-022-03727-y.

Gerges M, Eng H, Chhina H, Cooper A. Modernization of bone age assessment: comparing the accuracy and reliability of an artificial intelligence algorithm and shorthand bone age to Greulich and Pyle. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49(9):1449-57. doi:10.1007/s00256-020-03429-5.

Wang X, Zhou B, Gong P, Zhang T, Mo Y, Tang J, et al. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Bone Age Assessment to Improve the Accuracy and Consistency of Physicians With Different Levels of Experience. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:818061. doi:10.3389/fped.2022.818061.

Boitsios G, De Leucio A, Preziosi M, Seidel L, Aparisi Gómez MP, Simoni P. Are Automated and Visual Greulich and Pyle-Based Methods Applicable to Caucasian European Children With a Moroccan Ethnic Origin When Assessing Bone Age? Cureus. 2021 Feb 21;13(2):e13478. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13478.

Prokop-Piotrkowska M, Marszałek-Dziuba K, Moszczyńska E, Szalecki M, Jurkiewicz E. Traditional and new methods of bone age assessment-an overview. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2021;13(3):251. doi:10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2020.2020.006.

Sinkler M.A., Furdock R.J., Chen D.B., Sattar A., Liu R.W. The Systematic Isolation of Key Parameters for Estimating Skeletal Maturity on Lateral Elbow Radiographs. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2022; 104(22): 1993-1999. doi:10.2106/JBJS.22.00312.

Furdock R.J., Kuo A., Chen K.J., Liu R.W. Applicability of Shoulder, Olecranon, and Wrist-based Skeletal Maturity Estimation Systems to the Modern Pediatric Population. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2023; 43(7): 465-469. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002430.

Munger A.M., Yu K.E., Li D.T., Furdock R.J., Boeyer M.E., Duren D.L., Weber D.R., Cooperman D.R. The More the Merrier: Integrating Multiple Models of Skeletal Maturity Improves the Accuracy of Growth Prediction. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2021; 41(7): E580-E584. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000001847.

Rai V, Saha S, Yadav G, Tripathi AM, Grover K. Dental and skeletal maturity- A biological indicator of chronologic age. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014;8(9):ZC60-ZC64. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2014/10079.4862.

Bilgili Y, Hizel S, Kara SA, Sanli C, Erdal HH, Altinok D. Accuracy of skeletal age assessment in children from birth to 6 years of age with the ultrasonographic version of the Greulich-Pyle atlas. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22(7):683-90. doi:10.7863/jum.2003.22.7.683.

Publicado
2026-04-14
Cómo citar
Ataucure MG , M. N. D. (2026). Importancia del Método Greulich and Pyle en la Práctica Clínica Una Revisión Sistemática. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 10(1), 13912-13933. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v10i1.23289
Sección
Ciencias de la Salud