Pedagogical Paradigms in teaching EFL classroom: evaluating approaches of cognitivism, constructivism, pragmatism, and connectivism

Palabras clave: pedagogical approaches, cognitivism, constructivism, pragmatism, connectivism, English skills

Resumen

The aim of the teaching-learning process is to transmit knowledge, skills, and values to the student, who is the recipient. This process must be holistic: in its structure and methodology, it must contain various types of training. Separately, any one of these types of training can improve the quality and effectiveness of the others. At the same time, each type has its own distinctive features, which are determined by the psychological peculiarities of the teacher, the general educational goals, and the particular tasks. This study analyzes the teaching-learning process in the English area based on modern approaches in education, which are important theoretical movements that are currently being used: cognitivism, constructivism, pragmatism, and connectivism.

We used a convenience sample of for groups with a total number of 120 university students at the A2 English level. This case study was developed at the Technical University of Babahoyo. We used the English skills of listening, writing, speaking and writing and ICT platforms to put those approaches into practice. As result, the students get greater grades with the inclusion of each approach, getting average grades between 8.17 and 9.23 in the reading and cognitive approach, between 7.38 and 8.91 in the writing and constructivism approach, between 8.25 and 9.52 in the listening and connectivism approach.

The speaking activity related to the pragmatism approach was measured in the number of errors where there were between 10 and 16 pronunciation or coherence errors in a one-minute speech. In all the approaches they have a significant evolution since their first activity and also, we have satisfaction levels in all the dynamics above 91%. In conclusion, with adequate strategies, and effective technological and digital resources, multiple changes can be achieved by introducing these pedagogical approaches that allow students to develop their skills through collaborative learning tasks, promoting student autonomy, and fostering their ability to work together to develop their critical thinking and create a community-oriented environment for the students.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Alnujaidi, S. (2019). The Difference between EFL Students’ Preferred Learning Styles and EFL Teachers’ Preferred Teaching Styles in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 90–97.

Anastasie, U., & Cyprien, T. (2021). Theories underpinning language acquisition/learning: behaviourism, mentalist and cognitivism. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches , 8(4).

Bernal-Garzón, E. (2020). Aportes a la consolidación del conectivismo como enfoque pedagógico para el desarrollo de procesos de aprendizaje. Revista Innova Educación, 2(3), 394–412. https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rie.2020.03.002

Bolaño Muñoz, O. E. (2020). El constructivismo: Modelo pedagógico para la enseñanza de las matemáticas. Revista EDUCARE - UPEL-IPB - Segunda Nueva Etapa 2.0, 24(3), 488–502. https://doi.org/10.46498/reduipb.v24i3.1413

Cao, L. (2018). Study on College English Teaching Interaction and Teaching Practice Based on Connectivism from the Neurocognitive Perspective. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(5).

Carroll, J. B. (1978). How shall we study individual differences in cognitive abilities?—Methodological and theoretical perspectives. Intelligence, 2(2), 87–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(78)90002-8

Chen, X., Dewaele, J.-M., & Zhang, T. (2021). Sustainable development of EFL/ESL learners’ willingness to communicate: the effects of teachers and teaching styles. Sustainability, 14(1), 396.

Córdoba, M. E. (2020). El constructivismo sociocultural lingüístico como teoría pedagógica de soporte para los Estudios Generales. Revista Nuevo Humanismo, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15359/rnh.8-1.4

Descombes, V. (2010). The mind’s provisions: A critique of cognitivism. Princeton University Press.

Guerrero Salazar, C. V. (2022). Limitaciones del conectivismo en el Ecuador: necesidades urgentes para la calidad. Revista Científica Ciencia y Tecnología, 33(Vol. 22 Núm. 33 (2022)). https://doi.org/10.47189/rcct.v22i33.513

Liang, H., & Li, X. (2018). Research on Innovation Method of College English Translation Teaching Under the Concept of Constructivism. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.5.145

Liu, Y., Liu, H., Xu, Y., & Lu, H. (2020). Online English Reading Instruction in the ESL Classroom Based on Constructivism. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(4), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239519899341

López De La Cruz, E. C. I. (2021). El conectivismo, el nuevo paradigma del aprendizaje. Desafios, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.37711/desafios.2021.12.1.259

Lubis, M. A., Md. Yunus, M., & Embi, M. A. (2010). ICT and systematic steps in teaching and learning language in the classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2010.12.285

Macías Ibarra, J. E., & Barzaga Sablón, O. (2019). FUNDAMENTOS TEÓRICOS DEL CONSTRUCTIVISMO PARA LA ENSEÑANZA DE LA EDUCACIÓN FÍSICA. Revista Cognosis. ISSN 2588-0578, 4(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.33936/cognosis.v4i1.1578

Mantuano, M. O. M.-, Caviedes, E. C. E., Ladines, K. V. O., Rogel, D. R. P., & Yuqui, C. E. P. (2021). Análisis del conductismo, cognitivismo, constructivismo y su interrelación con el conectivismo en la educación postpandemia. South Florida Journal of Development, 2(5), 6850–6863. https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv2n5-038

Mata-García, B., & Zepeda-Moreno, M.-E. (2022). Los peligros del conectivismo. Presupuestos metodológicos para una pedagogía interterritorial para los pueblos rurales. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 119–134. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2022.37.1307

Mirzaev, A. B. U. (2022). IMPROVING EFL/ESL CLASSROOMS THROUGH USING ONLINE PLATFORMS: NEARPOD–AS AN EXAMPLE OF TOP-RATED ONLINE EDUCATIONAL PLATFORMS. Central Asian Academic Journal of Scientific Research, 2(4), 264–270.

Santander, M. (2018). El conectivismo como estrategia de enseñanza-aprendizaje post constructivista. XXVI Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores.

Tarnopolsky, O. (2018). Principled pragmatism, or well-grounded eclecticism: a new paradigm in teaching English as a foreign language at Ukrainian tertiary schools? Advanced Education, 10, 5–11.

Tarnopolsky, O., Kozhushko, S., Kliuchnyk, R., & Storozhuk, S. (2021). Secondary language personality and principled pragmatism in developing that personality in foreign language education at tertiary linguistic schools. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1898736.

Tigse-Carreño, C. (2019). El Constructivismo, según bases teóricas de César Coll. Revista Andina de Educación, 2(1), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.2019.2.1.4

Torres, E. M. A., Pérez, N. Y. M., Cardenas, K. J. A., & Cardenas, B. S. A. (2022). El Conectivismo, un nuevo paradigma para la educación. South Florida Journal of Development, 3(1), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv3n1-028

Yana, M., Arocutipa, A., Alanoca, R., Adco, H., & Yana, N. (2019). Estrategias cognitivas y la comprensión lectora en los estudiantes de nivel básica y superior. Revista Innova Educación, 1(2), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rie.2019.02.007

Yang, Y., Li, Y., Wang, X., Liu, N., Jiang, K., Zhang, S., & Qiu, J. (2021). Cognitive inhibition mediates the relationship between ESL listening proficiency and English spoken word segmentation in Chinese learners: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 59, 100987. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNEUROLING.2021.100987

Zhang, D. (2012). Vocabulary and grammar knowledge in second language reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling study. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 558–575.

Zhang, J., & Lin, H. (2018). The New Developments of Constructivism Theory and Its Reflection on College English Teaching in the Era of New Media―A Case Study of International Textile Trade English. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(6), 649. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0806.15

Publicado
2022-12-22
Cómo citar
Aguilar Parra, J. C., Reasco Garzón, B. C., Feijoo Rojas, K. J., Coello Vásquez, V. J., & Díaz Chong, M. (2022). Pedagogical Paradigms in teaching EFL classroom: evaluating approaches of cognitivism, constructivism, pragmatism, and connectivism. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 6(6), 14029-14045. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v6i6.4671
Sección
Artículos