The use of metacognition as a way to improve the learning process in EFL students

Palabras clave: Metacognition, learning process, academic achievement, teaching practices

Resumen

Metacognition, or the ability to reflect on one's own learning processes, has been identified as a key factor in improving academic achievement. In recent years, educators and researchers have been exploring ways to develop metacognitive skills in students to improve their learning outcomes. This study aimed to explore the perception of university students regarding the use of metacognition as a way to improve their learning process. The study was conducted among 200 undergraduate students from a public university in Babahoyo. The participants were asked to complete a questionnaire that assessed their metacognitive awareness and perceptions of using metacognition to improve learning. The results indicated that the majority of the students had a moderate level of metacognitive awareness, with a positive attitude towards the use of metacognition in learning. The study also found that students who had a higher level of metacognitive awareness were more likely to use metacognitive strategies such as planning, monitoring, and evaluating their learning process. These findings suggest that developing metacognitive skills can lead to better learning outcomes for university students. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of developing metacognitive skills in university students to improve their learning process. The findings suggest that students who have a higher level of metacognitive awareness are more likely to use metacognitive strategies, which can ultimately lead to better academic achievement. Educators should therefore incorporate metacognitive training into their teaching practices to enhance their students’ learning experience.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Harvard University Press.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academies Press.

Brown, A., & Thompson, C. (2019). The effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on reading comprehension: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000296

Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Sage Publications.

Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6-25.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

Johnson, E., & Lee, S. (2020). Effects of metacognitive strategy training on listening comprehension: An investigation with English language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 54(2), 314-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.548

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219-225.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.

Smith, J., Jones, L., & Miller, K. (2018). Metacognitive strategy instruction and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(4), 469-490. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.200

Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Routledge.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.

Publicado
2023-06-21
Cómo citar
Gortaire Díaz , D., Díaz Chong, E., Almache Granda, G., & Contreras Jordán, R. (2023). The use of metacognition as a way to improve the learning process in EFL students. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(3), 3837-3851. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i3.6446
Sección
Artículos