Artificial Intelligence in English Language Learning: Student Perspectives on AI Literacy, Academic Integrity, and Dependency at Universidad Tecnológica de Tijuana
Resumen
The increasing use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education has created new opportunities for English language learning while also raising concerns regarding academic integrity, student dependency, AI literacy, and institutional regulation. This study aims to analyze university students’ perceptions of these four dimensions in the context of English language learning at a technological university in Mexico. A quantitative, non-experimental, cross-sectional, and correlational research design was employed. Data were collected from 214 university students through a 16-item questionnaire organized into four constructs: Academic Integrity, AI Literacy, AI Dependency, and Institutional Regulation. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alpha, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to analyze the data. The results showed relatively high levels of AI Literacy (M = 3.77, SD = 0.88) and Academic Integrity (M = 3.61, SD = 0.86), whereas AI Dependency obtained a lower mean (M = 2.61, SD = 0.78). AI Literacy was positively correlated with Academic Integrity (r = .684, p < .001), while Academic Integrity and AI Literacy were also positively associated with Institutional Regulation. AI Dependency showed weak negative correlations with Academic Integrity and AI Literacy. Significant differences according to frequency of AI use were found for AI Dependency and Institutional Regulation, but not for Academic Integrity or AI Literacy. The findings suggest that responsible AI integration in English language education requires more than regulating access to technology; it also requires developing students’ AI literacy, maintaining academic integrity, and promoting learner autonomy through clear institutional guidance.
Descargas
Citas
An, Y., Yu, J. H., & James, S. (2025). Investigating the higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, 10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3
Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. F. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), 296.
https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296
Johnston, H., Wells, R. F., Shanks, E. M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4
Lee, S., Choe, H., Zou, D., & Jeon, J. (2026). Generative AI (GenAI) in the language classroom: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 34(1), 335–359.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2498537
Li, B., Lowell, V. L., Wang, C., & Li, X. (2024). A systematic review of the first year of publications on ChatGPT and language education: Examining research on ChatGPT’s use in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100266.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100266
Li, Y., Shadiev, R., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2026). Applying generative artificial intelligence to task-based language teaching and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. TechTrends, 70, 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01140-7
Li, Y., Zhou, X., Yin, H. B., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). Design language learning with artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots based on activity theory from a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 12, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00379-0
Lintner, T. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy scales. npj Science of Learning, 9, 50.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00264-4
Liu, J., Sihes, A. J. B., & Lu, Y. (2025). How do generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and large language models (LLMs) influence language learners’ critical thinking in EFL education? A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 12, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00406-0
McDonald, N., Johri, A., Ali, A., & Hingle, A. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 3, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100121
Ng, D. T. K., Wu, W., Leung, J. K. L., Chiu, T. K. F., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1082–1104.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13411
Wang, F., Li, N., Cheung, A. C. K., & Wong, G. K. W. (2025). In GenAI we trust: An investigation of university students’ reliance on and resistance to generative AI in language learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, 59.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00547-9
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Almusharraf, A., Mohammad, I. S., Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Alotaibi, T. (2025). Students’ perceptions of generative AI in EFL writing: Strategies, self-efficacy, satisfaction and behavioural intention. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.10045
Oda, M., Saito, R., & Horita, T. (2025). Exploring EFL learners’ perceptions of generative AI through the Technology Acceptance Model: Insights from an AI literacy program. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.58459/icce.2025.5998
Derechos de autor 2026 Gilda Torres Román , Blanca Román Ortiz

Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0.









.png)
















.png)
1.png)

